Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JoeLewisPhotography" data-source="post: 58616" data-attributes="member: 3571">Kirsten is a Ken Rockwell humper.&nbsp; I didnt knock her work, just said there were some decent shots.&nbsp; enough said about that. Oh and as for Ansel Adams, it was known that he was a TERRIBLE photographer.&nbsp; he didn't know his head from his butt when it came to his gear...but he was a master in the darkroom.&nbsp; I never said you couldnt get great shots from cheaper equipment.&nbsp; But show me an iphone photo that you think is great, printed out large, say 20x30 against the same shot taken with a pro body and lens, and then tell me which one is superior.&nbsp; I look at photography just like every other level headed photographer. You dont take things personal, well i think its a pretty apparent jab to pro photographers when you sit here and say they wasted their money and would be better off with a kit lens.&nbsp; Just because a kit lense works for you, doesnt mean its right for everyone.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JoeLewisPhotography, post: 58616, member: 3571"] Kirsten is a Ken Rockwell humper. I didnt knock her work, just said there were some decent shots. enough said about that. Oh and as for Ansel Adams, it was known that he was a TERRIBLE photographer. he didn't know his head from his butt when it came to his gear...but he was a master in the darkroom. I never said you couldnt get great shots from cheaper equipment. But show me an iphone photo that you think is great, printed out large, say 20x30 against the same shot taken with a pro body and lens, and then tell me which one is superior. I look at photography just like every other level headed photographer. You dont take things personal, well i think its a pretty apparent jab to pro photographers when you sit here and say they wasted their money and would be better off with a kit lens. Just because a kit lense works for you, doesnt mean its right for everyone. [/QUOTE]

Verification