Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AC016" data-source="post: 58614" data-attributes="member: 9619"><p>lol, well, maybe you did spend thousands of dollars for nothing, i think it may depend on how you look at photography<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />&nbsp; You would be very surprised on what some people can do with cheap cameras or even an iPhone!&nbsp; You can check out Ansel Adams...&nbsp; he is another example of someone who took stellar photographs with limited equipment.&nbsp; As he says, what matters in photography is what is behind the camera.&nbsp; I am not really one to take things personally, but i would think Kirsten would take it personally with you saying she has &quot;decent&quot; shots.&nbsp; Anyhow, i am sure that this debate can go on forever.&nbsp; Happy shooting<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="AC016, post: 58614, member: 9619"] lol, well, maybe you did spend thousands of dollars for nothing, i think it may depend on how you look at photography;) You would be very surprised on what some people can do with cheap cameras or even an iPhone! You can check out Ansel Adams... he is another example of someone who took stellar photographs with limited equipment. As he says, what matters in photography is what is behind the camera. I am not really one to take things personally, but i would think Kirsten would take it personally with you saying she has "decent" shots. Anyhow, i am sure that this debate can go on forever. Happy shooting:) [/QUOTE]

Verification