Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dudamel" data-source="post: 368061" data-attributes="member: 33273">Hi guys. I recently sold my beloved beginner D90 and got the D7000 + 18-105 for a fairly good price.I already own the 35mm 1.8G, and was getting lovely results, very happy with it.The thing is, im thinking on selling both 18-105 + 35mm, to get 35-70 2.8.I mainly use the prime for my work (almost 80%) (portraits, landscapes and some street), but not for the focal length, just for the fast f/2. I've already owned the 18-105 and was primarily sitting on my backpack almost all the time.Doing this makes me get closer to the subject by foot, i could really use that extra zoom as long as i keep the f2.8.If i get the 35-70, which has f2.8 (almost close to that f/2 on 35mm), would i notice a huge difference on sharpness or image quality?.I mean, using both on 35mm, f2.8 , is there a substantial difference?Thanks in advance.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dudamel, post: 368061, member: 33273"] Hi guys. I recently sold my beloved beginner D90 and got the D7000 + 18-105 for a fairly good price. I already own the 35mm 1.8G, and was getting lovely results, very happy with it. The thing is, im thinking on selling both 18-105 + 35mm, to get 35-70 2.8. I mainly use the prime for my work (almost 80%) (portraits, landscapes and some street), but not for the focal length, just for the fast f/2. I've already owned the 18-105 and was primarily sitting on my backpack almost all the time. Doing this makes me get closer to the subject by foot, i could really use that extra zoom as long as i keep the f2.8. If i get the 35-70, which has f2.8 (almost close to that f/2 on 35mm), would i notice a huge difference on sharpness or image quality?. I mean, using both on 35mm, f2.8 , is there a substantial difference? Thanks in advance. [/QUOTE]

Verification