Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
300 PF versus 200-500
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blacktop" data-source="post: 635131" data-attributes="member: 22693"><p>Thanks for doing this [USER=43924]@lokatz[/USER]. Having shot with the 200-500mm for a over a year, first on the D750 and now on the D500 it is the best lens that I own. I shot everything with it from bugs to flowers to birds to wildlife, and it still amazes me sometimes. If I could afford and justify <strong>adding</strong> a 300mm pf I would do it in a heartbeat. It would be an addition, not a replacement to the 200-500mm for those times when carrying the 200-500 is awkward.</p><p>Right now I have the 70-200mm f/2.8 to fill that need.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blacktop, post: 635131, member: 22693"] Thanks for doing this [USER=43924]@lokatz[/USER]. Having shot with the 200-500mm for a over a year, first on the D750 and now on the D500 it is the best lens that I own. I shot everything with it from bugs to flowers to birds to wildlife, and it still amazes me sometimes. If I could afford and justify [B]adding[/B] a 300mm pf I would do it in a heartbeat. It would be an addition, not a replacement to the 200-500mm for those times when carrying the 200-500 is awkward. Right now I have the 70-200mm f/2.8 to fill that need. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
300 PF versus 200-500
Top