Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
300 2.8 VS 200-400 f/4
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SacrificeTheory" data-source="post: 291952" data-attributes="member: 14451"><p>So once I purchase the 70-200 2.8G, I plan on getting a super telephoto lens. I like to take nature photography and since I plan on going to Africa in August 2015, I would love to bring one of these lenses along.</p><p></p><p>Question is, which do you think is worth the money more? They are both around the same price. Which gives you more bang for your buck and has the best quality.</p><p></p><p> If you have other options, I would be open to suggestions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SacrificeTheory, post: 291952, member: 14451"] So once I purchase the 70-200 2.8G, I plan on getting a super telephoto lens. I like to take nature photography and since I plan on going to Africa in August 2015, I would love to bring one of these lenses along. Question is, which do you think is worth the money more? They are both around the same price. Which gives you more bang for your buck and has the best quality. If you have other options, I would be open to suggestions. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
300 2.8 VS 200-400 f/4
Top
