Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
Out of Production DSLRs
D700
3 years old and still one of the best pro models - D700
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fotojack" data-source="post: 27376" data-attributes="member: 16"><p>I don't think the age of a camera should be a determining factor in acquiring or discounting it. If the camera does what you expect it to do, then it should be considered. Naturally, all the newer ones have all the bells and whistles of newer technology, but still, it remains the person behind the camera to make it "sing". My D200 is almost 6 years old, but it still functions admirably. I don't change for changes sake, just to keep up with the Jones. Tell you the truth, if I had the financial wherewithall to get another camera, I would pick the D300 and/or the D3. </p><p>Really, what it comes down to is what you can afford, and how the camera works for you. Everything else is fluff. I know people who have D90's that wouldn't trade them in for anything! </p><p>Anyway, that's just my take on it. Other opinions may vary. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fotojack, post: 27376, member: 16"] I don't think the age of a camera should be a determining factor in acquiring or discounting it. If the camera does what you expect it to do, then it should be considered. Naturally, all the newer ones have all the bells and whistles of newer technology, but still, it remains the person behind the camera to make it "sing". My D200 is almost 6 years old, but it still functions admirably. I don't change for changes sake, just to keep up with the Jones. Tell you the truth, if I had the financial wherewithall to get another camera, I would pick the D300 and/or the D3. Really, what it comes down to is what you can afford, and how the camera works for you. Everything else is fluff. I know people who have D90's that wouldn't trade them in for anything! Anyway, that's just my take on it. Other opinions may vary. :) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
Out of Production DSLRs
D700
3 years old and still one of the best pro models - D700
Top