Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ntinaras" data-source="post: 591787" data-attributes="member: 23848">What i have now I want to get a 24-70 2.8, and probably at the same time slowly get rid of my DX system.the question is which should i get?Nikons are very expensive, so unless i find someone selling it very cheap i can't afford itso my options are :Tokina, which has the best image qualitySigma, which is the cheapest and i could find it with less than 300 euro used!Tamron , which has the second best image quality, and has VC which could be useful because i shoot video sometimes.On paper they all look great.but i haven't used any of them, but only the Non VR Nikon, which was good, but very heavy <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" />I would like to hear some opinions regarding them, about image and build quality, auto-focus speed and accuracy, and anything else.Thank you in advance</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ntinaras, post: 591787, member: 23848"] What i have now I want to get a 24-70 2.8, and probably at the same time slowly get rid of my DX system. the question is which should i get? Nikons are very expensive, so unless i find someone selling it very cheap i can't afford it so my options are : [B]Tokina[/B], which has the best image quality [B]Sigma[/B], which is the cheapest and i could find it with less than 300 euro used! [B]Tamron [/B], which has the second best image quality, and has VC which could be useful because i shoot video sometimes. On paper they all look great. but i haven't used any of them, but only the Non VR Nikon, which was good, but very heavy :( I would like to hear some opinions regarding them, about image and build quality, auto-focus speed and accuracy, and anything else. Thank you in advance [/QUOTE]

Verification