Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Deleted" data-source="post: 371463" data-attributes="member: 29753">An IPS panel is better, especially for photography work due to the color consistency across all viewing angles. In addition a wide color gamut is important as it can display more colours &amp; more grey shades than a regular monitor.My personal preference from seeing &amp; installing many monitors is HP for price/performance. I myself have an Eizo, but they are difficult to source &amp; are expensive. The Dell Ultrasharps are ok, but they have a budget &quot;feel&quot; to them. If I was replacing my screen tomorrow, I would buy a HP Dreamcolor, being knocked out by the quality every time I visit a customer who has one.Some info about monitors here:<a href="http://photographylife.com/best-monitor-for-photography" target="_blank">Best Monitor for Photography</a><a href="http://photographylife.com/gear-guide/monitor-purchase-guide" target="_blank">Monitor Purchase Guide</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Deleted, post: 371463, member: 29753"] An IPS panel is better, especially for photography work due to the color consistency across all viewing angles. In addition a wide color gamut is important as it can display more colours & more grey shades than a regular monitor. My personal preference from seeing & installing many monitors is HP for price/performance. I myself have an Eizo, but they are difficult to source & are expensive. The Dell Ultrasharps are ok, but they have a budget "feel" to them. If I was replacing my screen tomorrow, I would buy a HP Dreamcolor, being knocked out by the quality every time I visit a customer who has one. Some info about monitors here: [url=http://photographylife.com/best-monitor-for-photography]Best Monitor for Photography[/url] [url=http://photographylife.com/gear-guide/monitor-purchase-guide]Monitor Purchase Guide[/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification