Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Danno_RIP" data-source="post: 538747" data-attributes="member: 34269">I will tell you what has served me well on my limited budget and given what I like to shoot. I have Sigma 18-250 mm 3.5-5.6 Macro HSM and a Tamron 28-75 mm 2.8.&nbsp; I use the Sigma as my walk around lens and try to take landscape and wild life...&nbsp; more trying on the wild life... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />I use the Tamron indoor and Church functions where I want a shallower depth of field and I am usually dealing with low light.&nbsp; They both work and I have fun every day. If I had to stick with only two, I would stick with these because of what I like to shoot.&nbsp; But thankfully this is just a hypothetical discussion and the Nikon 250-500 and&nbsp; Tokina 11-20 are still on the plan to purchase.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Danno_RIP, post: 538747, member: 34269"] I will tell you what has served me well on my limited budget and given what I like to shoot. I have Sigma 18-250 mm 3.5-5.6 Macro HSM and a Tamron 28-75 mm 2.8. I use the Sigma as my walk around lens and try to take landscape and wild life... more trying on the wild life... :) I use the Tamron indoor and Church functions where I want a shallower depth of field and I am usually dealing with low light. They both work and I have fun every day. If I had to stick with only two, I would stick with these because of what I like to shoot. But thankfully this is just a hypothetical discussion and the Nikon 250-500 and Tokina 11-20 are still on the plan to purchase. [/QUOTE]

Verification