Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Critique
1st time using LR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 326637" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>Adobe does lossless editing in JPG too, which means,yes, you might as well be shooting Raw.</p><p></p><p>If you make edits in the JPG, and save it, lossless means the original is always preserved, and it simply saves your edit info (the list of changes, so to speak). Then if you look at that image in other software, lossless means it only sees the original JPG, it does not see your edits. So Lightroom needs to output a new JPG for all other software to see (anything not Lightroom). Lightroom knows how to apply those edits to the new copy it outputs.</p><p></p><p>So it might as well be Raw. Raw has more range, does not suffer the original JPG problems, does not shift the data back and forth, etc. </p><p>Raw is pretty much the idea.</p><p></p><p>It is true that Raw does not have the camera settings in it. But you can of course set any of those settings you want in Lightroom for it, with the huge advantage of being able to see it first, to know what it needs, and to get it like you want it. This is extreme advantage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 326637, member: 12496"] Adobe does lossless editing in JPG too, which means,yes, you might as well be shooting Raw. If you make edits in the JPG, and save it, lossless means the original is always preserved, and it simply saves your edit info (the list of changes, so to speak). Then if you look at that image in other software, lossless means it only sees the original JPG, it does not see your edits. So Lightroom needs to output a new JPG for all other software to see (anything not Lightroom). Lightroom knows how to apply those edits to the new copy it outputs. So it might as well be Raw. Raw has more range, does not suffer the original JPG problems, does not shift the data back and forth, etc. Raw is pretty much the idea. It is true that Raw does not have the camera settings in it. But you can of course set any of those settings you want in Lightroom for it, with the huge advantage of being able to see it first, to know what it needs, and to get it like you want it. This is extreme advantage. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Critique
1st time using LR
Top