Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
17-50(55) 2.8 lenses- which to get, from a cost-benefit pov?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pedroj" data-source="post: 69165" data-attributes="member: 9297"><p>I think you'll have to convince your self...I don't think there would be to many people that have bought or used both/all</p><p></p><p>I have the Nikon 16-35mm F4 that does every thing I want it to do...When I bought it I read a lot of reviews with photos comparing sharpness, colour with the 24-70mm F2.8...I'm very happy with my decision...</p><p></p><p>Another thing to look at is if you are going full frame at all...The Nikon 17-55mm is a DX lens</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pedroj, post: 69165, member: 9297"] I think you'll have to convince your self...I don't think there would be to many people that have bought or used both/all I have the Nikon 16-35mm F4 that does every thing I want it to do...When I bought it I read a lot of reviews with photos comparing sharpness, colour with the 24-70mm F2.8...I'm very happy with my decision... Another thing to look at is if you are going full frame at all...The Nikon 17-55mm is a DX lens [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
17-50(55) 2.8 lenses- which to get, from a cost-benefit pov?
Top
