Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
17-35mm F/2.8D Nikkor vs. 14-24mm F/2.8G Nikkor lens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RRRoger" data-source="post: 57976" data-attributes="member: 9540"><p>I have both and use them for very different purposes.</p><p>Yes, the 14-24 is worth more.</p><p>I paid $900 for my 17-35 Mint. It does not squeek!</p><p>It is smaller, lighter, and takes cheap filters.</p><p></p><p>If you are deciding on only one, you need to get "hands on" before you buy.</p><p>You might also review the pictures you have taken to see what the widest is that you are/will be shooting.</p><p>There is nothing close to the 14-24 in quality except the 14 & 24mm fixed lens and they cost as much each.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RRRoger, post: 57976, member: 9540"] I have both and use them for very different purposes. Yes, the 14-24 is worth more. I paid $900 for my 17-35 Mint. It does not squeek! It is smaller, lighter, and takes cheap filters. If you are deciding on only one, you need to get "hands on" before you buy. You might also review the pictures you have taken to see what the widest is that you are/will be shooting. There is nothing close to the 14-24 in quality except the 14 & 24mm fixed lens and they cost as much each. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
17-35mm F/2.8D Nikkor vs. 14-24mm F/2.8G Nikkor lens
Top
