Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
17-35mm F/2.8D Nikkor vs. 14-24mm F/2.8G Nikkor lens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gqtuazon" data-source="post: 47501" data-attributes="member: 6573"><p>I skipped on the 17-35mm f2.8 and went for the 16-35mm f4 VRII instead. I do wonder from time to time entertain the idea of getting the 14-24mm f2.8 but I rarely shoot wider than 20mm on a FX camera. Although they now sell 3rd party lens filter adapters for the 14-24mm, that will add another $650 to $700 to the total cost. </p><p></p><p>Sharpness wise, the 16-35mm f4 trumps the 17-35mm f2.8.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gqtuazon, post: 47501, member: 6573"] I skipped on the 17-35mm f2.8 and went for the 16-35mm f4 VRII instead. I do wonder from time to time entertain the idea of getting the 14-24mm f2.8 but I rarely shoot wider than 20mm on a FX camera. Although they now sell 3rd party lens filter adapters for the 14-24mm, that will add another $650 to $700 to the total cost. Sharpness wise, the 16-35mm f4 trumps the 17-35mm f2.8. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
17-35mm F/2.8D Nikkor vs. 14-24mm F/2.8G Nikkor lens
Top
