Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
15mm Full Frame Fisheye vs. 16-35mm at the wide end
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 210584" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>I get the math, but that assumes the non-warping of space, which you get with a Fisheye. So while I understand that in theory it should be 153 degrees I was bothered by what I saw as something significantly less than that in the linked photo comparison where the L-to-R field of view was significantly less than 153 degrees, which is why I'm raising the question and asking about practical experience with these lenses. Obviously the photograph could be wrong.</p><p></p><p>I've done a lot of googling and reading and from the examples I'm seeing of shots with both the Nikon and the Sigma fisheyes it would seem that what I'd get is more effect than field of view, which is really what I want. I wish I was free to hit the PhotoPlus show this week in NYC to check them out in person, but alas that's not going to happen.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 210584, member: 9240"] I get the math, but that assumes the non-warping of space, which you get with a Fisheye. So while I understand that in theory it should be 153 degrees I was bothered by what I saw as something significantly less than that in the linked photo comparison where the L-to-R field of view was significantly less than 153 degrees, which is why I'm raising the question and asking about practical experience with these lenses. Obviously the photograph could be wrong. I've done a lot of googling and reading and from the examples I'm seeing of shots with both the Nikon and the Sigma fisheyes it would seem that what I'd get is more effect than field of view, which is really what I want. I wish I was free to hit the PhotoPlus show this week in NYC to check them out in person, but alas that's not going to happen. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
15mm Full Frame Fisheye vs. 16-35mm at the wide end
Top