Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
150-600mm telephoto lens: Sigma vs. Tamron?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 543636" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>Got mine last night and spent all of 10 minutes with it this morning. If I get a break I may go out and shoot some this afternoon.</p><p></p><p>Word to the wise, "military grade" is not to be taken "lightly". This thing is a beast. I knew that after using it at a show two Novembers ago, but I'd forgotten just how heavy 6 pounds is. Every spring I need to readjust to shooting handheld with a big lens, so I'm not sure how much of my initial "holy crap" was the lens and how much was not having used anything bigger than a 70-200mm f4 for 5 months, but it's not an insignificant lens. It's also a touch nose heavy, even using the collar on a monopod. My understanding is that the <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1154688-REG/sigma_at1900_tripod_socket_ts_81.html" target="_blank">replacement foot for the collar</a> is better balanced, but it's going to eat up my savings, not to mention that it's got an Arca-Swiss mount which doesn't play well with my Manfrotto monopod.</p><p></p><p>Not complaining, just sharing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 543636, member: 9240"] Got mine last night and spent all of 10 minutes with it this morning. If I get a break I may go out and shoot some this afternoon. Word to the wise, "military grade" is not to be taken "lightly". This thing is a beast. I knew that after using it at a show two Novembers ago, but I'd forgotten just how heavy 6 pounds is. Every spring I need to readjust to shooting handheld with a big lens, so I'm not sure how much of my initial "holy crap" was the lens and how much was not having used anything bigger than a 70-200mm f4 for 5 months, but it's not an insignificant lens. It's also a touch nose heavy, even using the collar on a monopod. My understanding is that the [URL="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1154688-REG/sigma_at1900_tripod_socket_ts_81.html"]replacement foot for the collar[/URL] is better balanced, but it's going to eat up my savings, not to mention that it's got an Arca-Swiss mount which doesn't play well with my Manfrotto monopod. Not complaining, just sharing. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
150-600mm telephoto lens: Sigma vs. Tamron?
Top