Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
105 Micros
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Silver" data-source="post: 152131" data-attributes="member: 14167"><p>Hey Glenn, thanks for the input. My inquiry is actually more of a curiosity on the degree of accuracy/relevance of photo magazine camera/lens tests, I'm satisfied with the Nikkor, as I stated I this my second. I went with my instinct. and experience...I never use the Micro past f/11 anyway, and more usually at f/8. I'm looking into focus stacking soon too. Lastly, Sigma lenses are definitely awesome contenders. I have the 150-500 zoom and I am amazed at the images obtained for a lens that costs barely over $1K.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Silver, post: 152131, member: 14167"] Hey Glenn, thanks for the input. My inquiry is actually more of a curiosity on the degree of accuracy/relevance of photo magazine camera/lens tests, I'm satisfied with the Nikkor, as I stated I this my second. I went with my instinct. and experience...I never use the Micro past f/11 anyway, and more usually at f/8. I'm looking into focus stacking soon too. Lastly, Sigma lenses are definitely awesome contenders. I have the 150-500 zoom and I am amazed at the images obtained for a lens that costs barely over $1K. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
105 Micros
Top
