Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AC016" data-source="post: 372939" data-attributes="member: 9619"><p>If you want a &quot;large canvas&quot;, get an 8 x 10 camera.&nbsp; We all know that the difference between FX and DX is negligible.&nbsp; I can get the same FOV with my 35mm that you get with you 50mm on your FX.&nbsp; Sure, there may be some very slight differences in the scene.&nbsp; But, for arguments sake, it's the same when you're considering the scene/frame. It's nice that you are happy with FX, but it's not the epitome of photography.&nbsp; Looking at your photos, i would have no idea that you shot them with an FX camera.&nbsp; Since they are on the web, you could have shot them with a DX camera for all i know.&nbsp; It really makes no difference when all you are doing is posting them on the web.&nbsp; When you say &quot;better&quot;, you are talking speeds and feeds.&nbsp; Who cares about speeds and feeds.&nbsp; Content is king.&nbsp; What you as the photographer produce is what matters.&nbsp; D810? D4S?&nbsp; Who cares!&nbsp; You don't need those cameras to take photos of buildings, flowers, cats, etc.&nbsp; If you are at the summer Olympics trying to get photos of Mr. Bolt leaving the blocks, then okay, a D4S it is.&nbsp; Right tool for the job.&nbsp; You don't need a Ferrari to go to the corner store.&nbsp; In regards to MFT, i think Rick_M is proving that it is all about photographic knowledge and skill rather then having a huge MP beast.&nbsp; Take a look at the Pentax 645D....&nbsp; now THAT is &quot;full frame&quot;.&nbsp; There is always something bigger and FX ain't it.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="AC016, post: 372939, member: 9619"] If you want a "large canvas", get an 8 x 10 camera. We all know that the difference between FX and DX is negligible. I can get the same FOV with my 35mm that you get with you 50mm on your FX. Sure, there may be some very slight differences in the scene. But, for arguments sake, it's the same when you're considering the scene/frame. It's nice that you are happy with FX, but it's not the epitome of photography. Looking at your photos, i would have no idea that you shot them with an FX camera. Since they are on the web, you could have shot them with a DX camera for all i know. It really makes no difference when all you are doing is posting them on the web. When you say "better", you are talking speeds and feeds. Who cares about speeds and feeds. Content is king. What you as the photographer produce is what matters. D810? D4S? Who cares! You don't need those cameras to take photos of buildings, flowers, cats, etc. If you are at the summer Olympics trying to get photos of Mr. Bolt leaving the blocks, then okay, a D4S it is. Right tool for the job. You don't need a Ferrari to go to the corner store. In regards to MFT, i think Rick_M is proving that it is all about photographic knowledge and skill rather then having a huge MP beast. Take a look at the Pentax 645D.... now THAT is "full frame". There is always something bigger and FX ain't it. [/QUOTE]

Verification