Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Macro
1:1 at f/36 Versus 1:2 at F/8 Cropped
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 424975" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>Those settings would translate into a DoF that is fairly similar. There can be one tenth of a millimetre difference but it's impossible to be that accurate in practice anyways. We rarely shoot at an exact magnification so I use rough values like 1x, 0.8x, 0.6x and 0.5x which I can <em>eyeball</em> using my focus points.</p><p></p><p>I have the other numbers on my PC since I use them on the D3300 so I have to verify if that formula is identical or not. If it is identical to this, I messed up by using f/8 instead of f/11. If it is different, some test shots will tell. I got the D750 after the macro season so I didn't have any chance to put it into practice with this one. I know when it starts to fall apart but shooting text and pencils isn't the same as shooting bugs.</p><p></p><p>For this cam 3 stops into shutter instead of 4 would make little difference since its low light performance is better than the D3300. F/11 is also ok since I only trade in about 5% lens performance by then which, when cropped, will still outperform the 30% performance loss at f/32. Shooting at f/8 only adds another 3% performance which likely won't be enough to crop at 0.42x. </p><p></p><p>For the D3300 it was even more profitable since that one really fell apart at f/32 or higher. I shot plenty that close down or closed to its max and at 100% the shots were all fuzziness.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 424975, member: 31330"] Those settings would translate into a DoF that is fairly similar. There can be one tenth of a millimetre difference but it's impossible to be that accurate in practice anyways. We rarely shoot at an exact magnification so I use rough values like 1x, 0.8x, 0.6x and 0.5x which I can [I]eyeball[/I] using my focus points. I have the other numbers on my PC since I use them on the D3300 so I have to verify if that formula is identical or not. If it is identical to this, I messed up by using f/8 instead of f/11. If it is different, some test shots will tell. I got the D750 after the macro season so I didn't have any chance to put it into practice with this one. I know when it starts to fall apart but shooting text and pencils isn't the same as shooting bugs. For this cam 3 stops into shutter instead of 4 would make little difference since its low light performance is better than the D3300. F/11 is also ok since I only trade in about 5% lens performance by then which, when cropped, will still outperform the 30% performance loss at f/32. Shooting at f/8 only adds another 3% performance which likely won't be enough to crop at 0.42x. For the D3300 it was even more profitable since that one really fell apart at f/32 or higher. I shot plenty that close down or closed to its max and at 100% the shots were all fuzziness. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Macro
1:1 at f/36 Versus 1:2 at F/8 Cropped
Top