Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Macro
1:1 at f/36 Versus 1:2 at F/8 Cropped
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scott Murray" data-source="post: 424918" data-attributes="member: 9753"><p>Now this is how I go take a macro...</p><p></p><p>I walk around, find a subject, set my settings which may be something like ISO 100-5000, f/2.8-f/40, S/S 1/200 - 1/5000, with or with out flash, with or with out Raynox filter, with or with out diffuser, with or with out flash, and guess what!? Depending on the subject available light and how I feel all these settings produce great results. I do not pixel peep (and I have a D800E) I will enlarge my photo in print as large as I like. All that matters to me is the final product and if I have achieved or captured something I am proud of. I have tried being scientific in macro and guess what, you can't especially with insects as there are too many variables like the size of the bug, how flighty the bug is and how close it allows you to it, how fast or slow it is moving/scurrying. how fast it flies and changes direction, if it jumps on your lens or attacks your diffuser, if other bugs are crawling up your leg and biting you in places that are tender... The list goes on. But this is just me and the way I take photos, I am no where near an expert but just like any other type of photography things change and you need to change and adapt to them... That is what being a photographer is all about, making the most of a given situation and sometimes achieving the impossible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scott Murray, post: 424918, member: 9753"] Now this is how I go take a macro... I walk around, find a subject, set my settings which may be something like ISO 100-5000, f/2.8-f/40, S/S 1/200 - 1/5000, with or with out flash, with or with out Raynox filter, with or with out diffuser, with or with out flash, and guess what!? Depending on the subject available light and how I feel all these settings produce great results. I do not pixel peep (and I have a D800E) I will enlarge my photo in print as large as I like. All that matters to me is the final product and if I have achieved or captured something I am proud of. I have tried being scientific in macro and guess what, you can't especially with insects as there are too many variables like the size of the bug, how flighty the bug is and how close it allows you to it, how fast or slow it is moving/scurrying. how fast it flies and changes direction, if it jumps on your lens or attacks your diffuser, if other bugs are crawling up your leg and biting you in places that are tender... The list goes on. But this is just me and the way I take photos, I am no where near an expert but just like any other type of photography things change and you need to change and adapt to them... That is what being a photographer is all about, making the most of a given situation and sometimes achieving the impossible. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Macro
1:1 at f/36 Versus 1:2 at F/8 Cropped
Top