The other day after reading Nikon's comment
even large amounts of camera movement are compensated for to give a smooth viewfinder image, I decided to give the active VR setting a try. I have chronic tendonitis in both forearms (with surgery on one) and quite often when I use the normal VR setting, I still wind up with a little motion blur. Yes, I raise my ISO to ensure a faster shutter speed, too, but I've had lack luster results with the normal VR. Here is a photo shot with the active VR. Granted, I wouldn't suggest this for everyone, but with my physical limitations, this is HUGE! Plus this photo was cropped A LOT from the original image. Some post sharpening was done, but even the out of camera results were MUCH better than when I use the normal VR.
I'm glad you posted the question because it's the reason I decided to give it a try!