+ Reply to Thread
Results 21 to 30 of 30
-
12-01-2020, 01:16 PM #21
Re: Scott's Filmstravaganza
It's an easy fix honestly
Sent from my SM-N986B using Tapatalk
› See More: Scott's Filmstravaganza
- 12-01-2020, 01:16 PM
12-01-2020, 05:43 PM #22Re: Scott's Filmstravaganza
Possibly load up the film for the first shot and shine a light around the seal, then seal it externally, with tape or something like plumbers putty. Then you should have a few shots without leaks. I bought a few cameras in a lot and they had a lot of duct (also duck) tape on them. Took the tape off and it left behind a residue. Turns out, the duct tape was the best thing to use to remove the residue!
RobIf you see this, this is my express permission to critique my signatures and photos!
Primary D5300 Other Nikon Bodies D5100 D3000 D90 D100 D70 D60 Parts Bodies D80 D100 D3000
AF-S 18-55; AF-S 55-200; AF NIKKOR 70-300; AF-P 70-300 Sigma 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM
Non Nikon Cameras worth a crap and worth mention: Samsung Galaxy S9+ Front 8MP f1.7 Rear 12MP f1.5 & f2.4
Paintshop Pro 2020 newb
12-02-2020, 07:59 AM #23Re: Scott's Filmstravaganza
I replaced the light seals in my camera. I was talking about my new P67 that I have not used yet and am unsure of light leaks. Woild rather waste a roll of film and fixing the issue rather than applying a band-aid fix. For a mint Medium Format film camera I am not putting putty or duct tape near it lol.
Sent from my SM-N986B using Tapatalk
12-12-2020, 01:53 AM #24Re: Scott's Filmstravaganza
Ok so I got my jpegs back from the Lab of my Pentax 67 test shots, low resolution scans. The negatives are being delivered to me.
I am very happy with them, I have noticed a line on the top of the film, hopefully this is from the scanning and not the camera. I will confirm once the negs get here.
All images are using Kodak Portra 160 (120MF), and using the internal exposure meter ETTR.
Please let me know your thoughts, these are also all unedited from the lab. Once I get the originals I will rescan them at a higher resolution and post the results.
Pentax 67 Kodak Portra 16060 by Scott Murray, on Flickr
Pentax 67 Kodak Portra 16060 by Scott Murray, on Flickr
Pentax 67 Kodak Portra 16060 by Scott Murray, on Flickr
Pentax 67 Kodak Portra 16060 by Scott Murray, on Flickr
Pentax 67 Kodak Portra 16060 by Scott Murray, on Flickr
Pentax 67 Kodak Portra 16060 by Scott Murray, on Flickr
Pentax 67 Kodak Portra 16060 by Scott Murray, on Flickr
Pentax 67 Kodak Portra 16060 by Scott Murray, on Flickr
Pentax 67 Kodak Portra 16060 by Scott Murray, on Flickr
Pentax 67 Kodak Portra 16060 by Scott Murray, on Flickr
12-12-2020, 03:00 AM #25Re: Scott's Filmstravaganza
Scott, I used to shoot Ektar 25 ISO in 120 and absolutely loved it when there was enough light. Fuji Velvia was my choice when the light wasn't enough for the 25. The Velvia had such rich colors that it was a shame to waste it on some subjects.
WMScott Murray Thanks/liked this post
12-12-2020, 05:21 AM #26Re: Scott's Filmstravaganza
12-12-2020, 06:09 PM #27
12-22-2020, 11:03 AM #28
12-25-2020, 12:17 AM #29
12-29-2020, 10:51 AM #30Re: Scott's Filmstravaganza
Lab Scan VS DSLR scan. Can you guess which is which?
DSLR VS LAB NEGATIVE SCAN by Scott Murray, on Flickr
DSLR VS LAB NEGATIVE SCAN by Scott Murray, on Flickr
12-29-2020, 10:51 AM
Similar Threads
-
Project 365 & Daily Photos
-
Project 365 & Daily Photos
-
Project 365 & Daily Photos
-
Computers and Software
-
General Photography
Re: PC connection lead