Posted these in another post I got the 16-300 today a couple
of quick shots hand held. will take it for a walk in morning all being well.
View attachment 118403
View attachment 118404
Treating you well, @Plilnz?
My wife has just had a knee replacement so.
I hope that everything will be fine. Take care of your beloved one
I had that very decision to make today, I could get the 18-270 and a nice tripod or the 16-300. After taking pics on my body in the store with both and talking to the camera guy, who said the only difference between the two is the zoom range and not optical quality, I went with the 18-270. I compared the two images from both lenses when I got home in Lightroom and could not tell a difference when set at the same settings.I'd love to know how this lens compares to Tamron's 18-270mm lens. The price difference on Amazon is currently around £200. The extra 2mm and 30mm at each end surely won't make a huge difference, if the 18-270mm can match up well for image quality etc. then that's what I'd go for and put the extra £200 towards a nice macro lens.
Coffee Time
View attachment 120986