bluzman
Senior Member
If you do, I'd appreciate your thoughts. FWIW, I've read/watched several reviews and none of them are particularly negative. OTOH, it would be interesting to get a real owner's perspective.
=======================
Here's the back story. I have a Z50 that I got almost two years ago. It was packaged with the two kit lenses and the FTZ adapter. Subsequently, I added two more Z lenses to my mirrorless set up. Here's what I have now.
I'm happy with the current line up but...there's always a "but".
Now that the NIKKOR Z DX 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR is available, I've been thinking about how much I used and liked the F mount version of that lens as a general purpose/walking around lens when I just wanted to carry a simple rig. Up until now, my full frame Z 24-70mm f/4 S has served that purpose but it lacks VR and, since the Z50 lacks IBIS, I have to be a bit more aware of my shutter speed when using that rig.
=======================
Here's the back story. I have a Z50 that I got almost two years ago. It was packaged with the two kit lenses and the FTZ adapter. Subsequently, I added two more Z lenses to my mirrorless set up. Here's what I have now.
- NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR
- NIKKOR Z DX 50-250mm f/4.5-6.3 VR
- NIKKOR Z FX 24-70mm f/4 S
- Viltrox Z DX 23mm F1.4 AF
I'm happy with the current line up but...there's always a "but".
Now that the NIKKOR Z DX 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR is available, I've been thinking about how much I used and liked the F mount version of that lens as a general purpose/walking around lens when I just wanted to carry a simple rig. Up until now, my full frame Z 24-70mm f/4 S has served that purpose but it lacks VR and, since the Z50 lacks IBIS, I have to be a bit more aware of my shutter speed when using that rig.
