Nikon 200-500 filter issue

I purchased a Fotga 95mm filter (cheap Chinese) as a lens protector. The filter does not seem to fit. The thread seems different and I do not want to force it. Anyone had similar issues?

Welcome to the forum

Not a make i know but your phrase cheap Chinese concerns me,if you want a filter on buy a good one,a cheap one could get stuck and ruin you image quality,now will start the you dont need a filter.::what::

If you want to keep trying with the one you have try rotating it the wrong way to seat it then gently the right way.

Thanks Mike. I may trash it for a quality metal ring one. Size 95mm seem to be rare.
I tried rotating it back and even put on a little silicon without success.

The thing is a filter will not protect from certain imact situations,it will protect from scratches or smudges and weather,this is where it gets personal i dont believe a top quality one has any effect on IQ,i do believe a scratch or mark that will not come off destroys its resell value.
Go for the highest quality you can from a reputable dealer,ebay has been known to sell fakes.

I like to have a filter on when walking through the bush. If i'm going for a serious shot I take the filter off. In saying that sometimes an opportunity arrises and I do not get time to remove the filter.
So the answer is, as you said, to put on a better quality filter. Unfortunately the big 95mm commands big $$$'s.

Why not just leave the lens cap on until you're ready to shoot? I see no need for a filter (as protection) when a lens has a gigantic lens hood, other than perhaps a polarizer, ND or a solar eclipse filter. Especially when you have a 95mm size - big $$$.

It gives me a little insurance against dust, rain, scratching, etc. Also if it does get dirty in the field I can remove it and keep on shooting.
I have damaged filters in the past which have Intern saved my lens.

Welcome aboard. Enjoy the ride.
We look forward to seeing more posts and samples of your work.

Rosco1948 said:

I purchased a Fotga 95mm filter (cheap Chinese) as a lens protector. The filter does not seem to fit. The thread seems different and I do not want to force it. Anyone had similar issues?

Click to expand...

95mm filters are going to be costly for anything decent, so stand by for some potential "sticker shock".

The best option, IMO, would be a filter from Breakthrough Photography. Their 95mm UV filter will set you back $149.

A less expensive option would the B+W 95mm UV filter for $84.

Waving off any potential static from anyone who might feel compelled to point it out... I am fully aware digital cameras do not need UV protection, but that's about your only option for a protective filter of 95mm. Hoya is set to release 95mm HD Protectors, but I don't think they've actually hit the street yet. And yes, there are other brands that meet your needs, but none I'm willing to actually *suggest* (Fotasy, Polaroid, et al (you bets yer money and you takes yer chances)). I love my Hoya HD protectors, and recommend them highly, so if you're interested you might try contacting Hoya directly with questions about availability.

I have the B&W F-Pro on my 200-500. I don't remember what it cost, but I do know that the food budget was jeopardized for awhile. Ha!

I normally use Hoya and am delighted to hear a 95mm one will be released.
Thanks Nikonites for all the replies.:eagerness:

Just popping in to say howdy and welcome. I also have a 95mm filter for the front of my 200-500, but it's been awhile so I don't remember the exact cost other than the initial sticker shock.

Glad you're finding the info you needed!

I have the B&W as well. I cannot remember the price but it was reasonable and I like it on humid or foggy mornings when the glass will fog a bit.

I ended up purchasing a Kenko lens protector filter and it screwed straight on. Glass in Almite frame. All good.
thanks for all the replies.

Rosco1948 said:

I ended up purchasing a Kenko lens protector filter and it screwed straight on. Glass in Almite frame. All good.
thanks for all the replies.

Click to expand...

Good luck with the new acquisition! I hope it works for you!

WM

Nikon makes a neutral color 95mm filter - I purchased it about a month ago and am pleased with it. $129 on Amazon ($179 on Nikon), not cheap but worth it to me given the value of my 200-500 lens

----------------------------------------------------------------

Hi I'm Liz! Here's my gig:
Nikon D7200
Nikkor 18-140mm AF-S VR f/3.5-5.6
Nikkor 35mm AF-S f/1.8
Nikkor 200-500mm AF-S VR f/5.6
iPhone 7 Plus
Photoshop CS6

Rosco1948 said:

It gives me a little insurance against dust, rain, scratching, etc. Also if it does get dirty in the field I can remove it and keep on shooting.
I have damaged filters in the past which have Intern saved my lens.

Click to expand...

Some of these arguments are valid, like the dirt one. Having a protective filter is a convenience there. As far as scratching goes, which many people see as the strongest aspect (and you seem to do, too), watch Steve Perry's experiments. After seeing this, and having experienced myself how easily UV filters break, I decided against putting any on my expensive 300mm and 200-500mm lenses. A good lens cleaning kit is a lot cheaper...