Post your D7200 high ISO
- Thread starter mikew_RIP
- Start date
Now lets see that ISO 6400 shot without any NR. (just sayin'):indecisiveness:Why should Don and the D750 have all the limelightthe D750 may be king but the D7200 can give it a run for its money.
ISO 6400
View attachment 194538
There may have been some on the background i cant remember but none on the subject as i dont do that,sometimes i just use lens blur on the background.
Not bad. It clearly has at least a 1 stop advantage over the D7100 in good light.
Thanks for these examples, I clearly can not reach that with my D7000. Strangly makes me believe the D500 will have this quality at 12800 ISO, do not see why it would not be possible.
Now go to measurements:
DXO Mark gives a completely different score to the ISO value of the D7200 vs D610.
However I only look at their Measurements Dynamic Range Screen and there the D7200 is the same as a D610. Predicts this ISO 6400 quality.
Senscore Noise:
Nikon D7200 519
Nikon D610 977
So somewhere technically an FX gives a cleaner image then a DX (measurable), but it does not mean that the ISO performance today of a DX can not be sufficient for most use at what is considered high ISO.
Now go to measurements:
DXO Mark gives a completely different score to the ISO value of the D7200 vs D610.
However I only look at their Measurements Dynamic Range Screen and there the D7200 is the same as a D610. Predicts this ISO 6400 quality.
Senscore Noise:
Nikon D7200 519
Nikon D610 977
So somewhere technically an FX gives a cleaner image then a DX (measurable), but it does not mean that the ISO performance today of a DX can not be sufficient for most use at what is considered high ISO.
I am going to try 12800 out of interest,the results at the moment are better than i got with the 7000 and 7100,as i said though i do not do any NR on the main subject,ime just not good enough at it to not lose detail.
I think you may be right about the D500 but that should extend to the D5 and so make it better.
If staying with DX and hoping for advances in noise control i think we are past the stage of giant leaps forward and into paying extra for just 1 to 2 stops.
If you say the D5 will be better in ISO performance then the D500, you are right. The D4S is probably even better then the D500.
Does that make it the better camera for all, certainly not. More people will do things they like with a D7X00, D500 than they would with a D5.
Some others will do things with the D5 impossible for other cameras, but not that many people.
I`m impressed with the ISO you show, I saw some people say we do not dare enough. I`ll push my D7000 a bit more too I believe.
Same here. My shots at high iso don't look good. Is there something i should be using besides lightroom?
Horoscope Fish
Senior Member
NIK Tools "Dfine" is my preferred noise reduction tool.
As i said i dont do noise reduction on the main subject,i may brush it in on the background,the other thing that is an enemy is under exposure especially at higher ISOs,i know the problem of blowing high lights but i try to take at ;least two with a + dialed in on high ISOs shots.
Just had a play with your shots in ACR and photoshop,its not good as they are small files.
Yours
Mine
Yours
Mine
canuck257
Senior Member
Me too. Mikes efforts above REALLY show how much I have to learn.
canuck257
Senior Member
Care to share your secrets Mike? I'm VERY impressed.
I believe that's where most of my problems are
I'd like to see the whites brought up a bit on this one Mike???