I think it's much better indeed. Good work.
Question: If the focus point was the pebbled beach in the foreground and the AF-L button held down, could a shot like this be then re-composed so the pebbles in the foreground as well as the huts in the background are both in tack sharp focus? Or would that be beyond the capabilities and expecting too much of a DSLR?
That's a depth of field issue, Ken. If you focus on the pebbles, and the houses are out of focus, when you hold the AF-L button and recompose, the pebbles will still be in focus and the houses out of focus. You don't add focus or depth of field. The only way to do that is to use an f-stop of f/22 or 16 (depending on the lens.) Hope I got what you were asking.
That's a depth of field issue, Ken. If you focus on the pebbles, and the houses are out of foucus, when you hold the AF-L button and recompose, the pebbles will still be in focus and the houses out of focus. You don't add focus or depth of field. The only way to do that is to use an f-stop of f/22 or 16 (depending on the lens.) Hope I got what you were asking.
Not necessarily, Heather. It depends on the effect you want. The eye is going to go to the focused area first rather than the unfocused. So sometimes you want shallow depth of field. So, just for the sake of experimenting, imagine your same shot, taken at a very large f-stop (the focal length of your lens also has an effect) that puts only some or part of the beach huts in focus. The picture then becomes a little more "mysterious". It's all a matter of experimentation, personal taste and vision. You are to be applauded for using manual! That's the best way to learn!Helene, would this have been better with a higher f-stop?