thegaffney
Senior Member
I want to buy a 24 2.8 for doing night photos, and maybe even use it for my automotive photography if the quality is good.
I don't mind if its manual focus, and I don't mind having to figure out the exposure myself.
So the question is, which one of the models of the 24 2.8 would be OK for me?
I see the AF-D lenses are a bit more pricy than the non-D lens, would I need the D part?
Like I was looking at this one and it seems nice? And its under $200 so I like that about it too.
But then there are older ones for about $150
and A sigma one for even less than that
If the difference in the Nikon ones is only the advantages of the autofocus or metering Id rater get the cheaper one since I would be using it manually all the time.
Does anyone know about the sigma one?
I don't mind if its manual focus, and I don't mind having to figure out the exposure myself.
So the question is, which one of the models of the 24 2.8 would be OK for me?
I see the AF-D lenses are a bit more pricy than the non-D lens, would I need the D part?
Like I was looking at this one and it seems nice? And its under $200 so I like that about it too.
But then there are older ones for about $150
and A sigma one for even less than that
If the difference in the Nikon ones is only the advantages of the autofocus or metering Id rater get the cheaper one since I would be using it manually all the time.
Does anyone know about the sigma one?