Howdy Y'all

I

idr1219

Senior Member
Hello!

I am new to the forum and to Nikon cameras. I shoot a Pentax K100d at this time, but will be buying a new Nikon soon. I am looking at the D7000. My dilemma is the following. Best Buy has a package sale consisting of the D7000 + the 18-105mm for $999USD or the above mentioned and the 55-300mm for $1299USD. Is the 55-300mm worth paying $300 more? I am a hobbyist and like to shoot landscapes, portraits, architectural and some street candid. I look forward to learning and contributing in the future. Thank you for your feedback in advance!
 
K

Krs_2007

Senior Member
Welcome. I have the D7000 and the 18-105 ( as well as other FX lenses) and the 18-105 serves its purpose. If you want the reach then I would go the 55-300, I just cant comment on that lens.
 
N

N_Addy

Senior Member
Also, if you go with the 55-300 you are still going to need to buy a lens to cover the 18 to 55 range. You'll probably spend more time shooting in it than above 55mm.
 
RockyNH_RIP

RockyNH_RIP

Senior Member
Welcome to Nikonites... I have the 18-105 and the 55-300... Some will tell you that the 70 - 300 is a better lens, and they may be right. The 55-300 has done a fine job for me (though a little slow to focus).

I bought my lens as a Factory Refurb from Adorama, they have the 55-300 for $209..

Pat in NH
 
I

idr1219

Senior Member
N_Addy said:
Also, if you go with the 55-300 you are still going to need to buy a lens to cover the 18 to 55 range. You'll probably spend more time shooting in it than above 55mm.
Click to expand...

You are correct...I am getting the 18-105mm, but I am trying to decide if $300 more is a good deal for the 55-300mm, in addition to the 18-105mm
.
 
Roy1961

Roy1961

Senior Member
Contributor
i am with Pat, at xmas i bought the D7000 with the 18-105 for $1199, then bought the 55-300 lens for $379, i use both but the 300 is mainly on the camera.
 
Top