Nikon 70-300 Question

I was poking around Adorama this morning and found this: [h=1]Nikon 70-300mm f/4-5.6G AF Telephoto Zoom Nikkor Lens with HB-26 Hood (Black) - Grey Market[/h]They are selling it for $119. Why is this lens so much cheaper than the new 70-300 lens? I can see that it doesn't have vibration reduction and is used, but are there other concessions I would be making by purchasing this lens versus the new one?

The 70-300 is not a pro level lens, so the build quality is so so,, that price seems to about right, a refurbished one goes for around 130-150 dollar range.

Optically, they are ok, nothing to brag about, but can fill a niche. Stop down the fstop to f8 for higher resolution pictures, and remember that at the tele range, that you will need faster shutter speeds to avoid lens shake effects.

The newer VR version would help with hand holds, and optically, the lens is improved a bit more, with slightly better build quality.

So, I would say 119 good price, and since dealer, should be fine.

It will also not autofocus on the D5100, if that's important.

You would be better of trying to find one with VR big diffrence in IQ

Yes, if you buy the 70-300, it is likely you are looking at the 300 range. Then VR is important for that kind of range. I am using one and is happy with the result. The only problem is when you need a longer zoom and try to add a teleconverter, the f stop drop and focus is a problem.

I just got a kenko 1.4 and will be trying it out. Most likely can only work under strong light.

With grey market lenses, there is no support from Nikon. No warranty. If the dealer warranties it, that's another story.

Don't waste your money on the non VR one. I had one, used it twice and sold it.