Boudoir/Pinup Photos of my Wife [Possibly NSFW, but probably not].

Bob Blaylock

Senior Member
It started several months ago. Unexpectedly, after more than twenty years of marriage, my wife expressed willingness to be photographed while she was bathing, and for me to post such photographs where nobody knows her, as long as they didn't show certain parts that would be covered by a bathing suit.

This picture, resulting from that, ended up being used as my entry for a weekly challenge.

184517d1445843384-weekly-challenge-oct-21-oct-28-water-dsc_2868zn.jpg


Alas, it didn't score very well, which I found myself feeling more inclined than usual to take personally. On giving it some rational thought, I shouldn't really be surprised. My wife is a fairly modest woman, and to me, being allowed to photograph her in such a manner is quite significant, and even more so, being able to share any such photograph outside of my own view. But given the plethora of much less modest, much younger women out there who freely share pictures of themselves showing much more than my wife would ever allow, I guess it's to be expected that my own pictures of my wife won't be seen as nearly significant by others as they seem to me.

But it has started me on something of a quest to produce attractive and flattering pictures of my wife. Now, I'll come out and say it. I know very well that my wife isn't exactly supermodel material. If I had married someone who was, then there wouldn't be much challenge. But I've embraced the challenge, and so far, I seem to be sometimes producing very satisfying results.

The vast majority of the pictures that I have taken in this line, I cannot share, and alas, the best ones, for the most part, are among these that I cannot share. I have quite a few, now, that do show parts that just are not for anyone's eyes but my own and my wife's; and even among pictures that technically meet the rule of “not showing parts that a bathing suit would cover”; there have been some that my wife is uncomfortable with having shared anyway. In some cases, this had led me to try to recreate these images again, with whatever alterations were necessary for my wife to be OK with them being shared.

The first “bathing suit rule-compliant” pictures that I could not share were taken with her nude, on the bed, in a prone position, facing the camera. I got some really beautiful pictures, with really beautiful facial expressions, which didn't show any actual intimate parts, but when she saw them, she was uncomfortable with how “naked” she thought she looked in them, so I can't share any of them. A day or two later, we recreated the shoot, this time in a few different nightgowns. Out of that shoot, I got this picture, which also ended up being used as an entry in one of the weekly challenges.

ASC_6285_9x10n.jpg

I don't like this one nearly as much as the nude version I had done a day or two earlier. This time, I had per put on “light” makeup, which ended up looking much heavier and more unnatural than I like, and we didn't ever get facial expressions that I liked nearly as much as what came out of the previous shoot. Still, I like this picture on its own merit, even if it fell short of the bar set a day or two earlier.

Another shoot that met the “bathing suit rule”, also produced pictures with which she was uncomfortable, but I had much greater success recreating it a day or two ago, in a form that she would allow me to share.

ASC_6887_1000x909.jpg

The nightgown is very sheer, except for the bodice, l and although the camera did not have a line of sight to certain parts that, from a different angle, would be clearly visible, the idea that the picture implied these parts to be exposed made her uncomfortable. What it took was to take a picture in which it was clear that she was wearing something else to cover those parts.

For the “Purple” weekly challenge I specifically set up a shoot with my wife to go “beyond purple”, having her in lingerie, under an ultraviolet light, causing the lingerie to fluoresce and show up, with any exposed skin being barely visible. Of four final pictures as candidates for that challenge, she vetoed one on the basis that she thought she saw an intimate part showing through. I don't think it's what she thought it was, but it's her call, so only three of the four can be shared, of which this is the one that I used for the entry:

ZSC_6523n.jpg

That's the same nightgown as in the previous picture, and also the same as in this next picture.

ZSC_6522n.jpg

And this was with a different, shorter, “babydoll-style” nightgown, which I believe is the same one she is wearing a few pictures back, where she is prone, and wearing makeup.

ZSC_6520n.jpg


At this point, I'm growing weary of telling stories about the pictures, so I'll just post what remaining pictures seem suitable for this post, with minimal further comment.

DSC_2898zbn.jpg DSC_2894zn.jpg CSC_1730n.JPG CSC_1730n_DxOFP.JPG CSC_0931n.JPG ZSC_6009cN.jpg ZSC_5791n.jpg ZSC_5810n.jpg ZSC_5833n.jpg ZSC_5347an.jpgZSC_5347bn.jpg ZSC_5348n.jpg ZSC_5350n.jpg ZSC_5351n.jpg ZSC_5355n.jpg
 
Last edited:

Krs_2007

Senior Member
Mystery.... I think that is key for this style of photography. For me it's not always about the subject but the mystery of the situation. So leave me feeling like I want to see more, leave me feeling like what is behind that fabric.

This is a special type of photography because there is a fine line with it. And it's a specific taste, meaning everyone has their own taste.

Kudos for trying and don't give up. If it works for you and the subject than you succeeded.

The last group of shots, the 3rd one I see with only the legs and hosiery is an example of that.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 

RON_RIP

Senior Member
Yes mystery is the key. It is not what is exposed, but what is only suggested the stimulates the imagination. Soft focus and low light can add to the quality. Keep practicing. natural window light can also be an enhancement
 

Bob Blaylock

Senior Member
Yes mystery is the key. It is not what is exposed, but what is only suggested the stimulates the imagination. Soft focus and low light can add to the quality. Keep practicing. natural window light can also be an enhancement

I very much like the lighting that comes in that window during the day. It's very flattering light.

But that window also looks out to a public area. Quite understandably, my wife's not OK with that window being uncovered if she's in skimpy lingerie or less, carelessly sharing the unvetted view with anyone who happens to walk by. She was OK for it with the shoots in that plain, frumpy nightgown, but not in the more revealing stuff.

I'm wondering if there's something we can find on our tight budget, that can easily be put over that window, to allow the light in, but not the view of outsiders.

We do have this rather nice lamp, which, fortunately, produces a nice, even lighting, not quite as good as from the window, but better than most lamps. Alas, it has the same sickly-yellow cast to it that is common to most CFLs, but I can compensate for that in postprocessing.

ZSC_6911n.jpg
 

Krs_2007

Senior Member
I don't remember who posted, but of the cheapest way to use the window is with a frosted shower curtain. You can allow the light to come through but not be seen from the outside. Just think of things that will block the view but not the light.

There may be other ideas but that is about as cheap as it gets, say around 5.00

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 

RocketCowboy

Senior Member
I don't remember who posted, but of the cheapest way to use the window is with a frosted shower curtain. You can allow the light to come through but not be seen from the outside. Just think of things that will block the view but not the light.

There may be other ideas but that is about as cheap as it gets, say around 5.00

Shower curtain for sure. I think even Joe McNally referenced that in one of his books that I read ... with all the Lastolite kit he has at his disposal, sometimes a shower curtain is just what you need.

Great diffuser and has the added perk of blocking outsiders from looking in.
 
Top