For a better understanding of color!!!

F

Flugelbinder

Senior Member
Some of you guys remind me of those scared children, that always stick behind the bully, affraid of something... The full article was shortened to fit the 2000 limit...
 
Last edited:
Scott Murray

Scott Murray

Senior Member
Flugelbinder said:
You guys remind me of those scared children, that always stick behind the bully, affraid of something... The full article was shortened to fit the 2000 limit...
Click to expand...
You remind me of someone who post alot but never delivers. I am still waiting to see a decent photo from yourself.
 
ohkphoto

ohkphoto

Snow White
Flugelbinder said:
You guys remind me of those scared children, that always stick behind the bully, affraid of something... The full article was shortened to fit the 2000 limit...
Click to expand...

What does this have to do with your thread???

First of all, is this work/article authored and owned by you, including the images? If not, attribution needs to be stated otherwise it's a copyright violation.

Secondly, an "article" of this length does not need to be in a post. Simply post a link to it and let members decide if they want to follow it. If this is an article you have "paraphrased and condensed", then put it in a blog.

Thirdly, this is at least the second thread where you make some odd comment that is in some way disparaging toward members, and whose purpose seems to be to incite some type of argument. If you don't know how to behave in this forum, I suggest you step back a little and observe before you put "your foot in your mouth" (again) and earn the label of "troll."
 
S

Steve B

Senior Member
ohkphoto said:
What does this have to do with your thread???

First of all, is this work/article authored and owned by you, including the images? If not, attribution needs to be stated otherwise it's a copyright violation.

Secondly, an "article" of this length does not need to be in a post. Simply post a link to it and let members decide if they want to follow it. If this is an article you have "paraphrased and condensed", then put it in a blog.

Thirdly, this is at least the second thread where you make some odd comment that is in some way disparaging toward members, and whose purpose seems to be to incite some type of argument. If you don't know how to behave in this forum, I suggest you step back a little and observe before you put "your foot in your mouth" (again) and earn the label of "troll."
Click to expand...
I'm trying to figure out if there is a way to like your post more than once. :D
 
hark

hark

Administrator
Staff member
Super Mod
Wait a second, why are there 2 threads for this topic? It certainly doesn't deserve the double exposure.
 
wud

wud

Senior Member
Flugelbinder, seriously.. gotta know... Why do you get so annoyed sometimes? I like you but I really don't understand your second post? Scott asked a question, I think he (I know I did) at first thought it was you who wrote that article. And yes, you need to post the link for the author, or else its just plain www-robbery..
 
Scott Murray

Scott Murray

Senior Member
Brian said:
I remember talking with one of the Kodak Engineers about 20 years ago that worked with Dr Bayer. A Bayer filter, named for Dr Bayer, refers to the specific arrangement of Red-Green-Blue pixels in a two-by-two matrix as:

RGRGRGRGRGRGRG
GBGBGBGBGBGBGB
RGRGRGRGRGRGRG
GBGBGBGBGBGBGB

Which makes most efficient use of spatial interpolation for the image. Dr. Bayer came up with this pattern, and patented it. Oddly enough, the Kodak DCS100 did not use it. The general term is "Mosaic Filter" for sensors with other arrangements.

Unless you need a quick picture out of the camera, you are better to shoot RAW mode with as many bits as possible in the image. This gives the most flexibility in post-processing an image. Like shooting negatives instead of a Polaroid. At Kid's Parties- the Polaroid was the best camera to have around as you could give them to the kids and parents to take home. Kind of like downloading them a JPEG, they can look at it on their computer. Give them a NEF- forget it.
Click to expand...
There could even be

RGBW found in some Kodak's ;-)
 
Scott Murray

Scott Murray

Senior Member
For those that do not understand the colour spectrum, there are more colours than RGB. We can even get to saying that the narrower the field of colour the more you can see and this is not more important than deep space and sunspotting. As most is done in the Hydrogen Alpha range or H-Alpha and since this is within that range I brought up the question.

Here is a diagram of the colour spectrum (not my image) Visible-spectrum-600x286.jpg and the H-alpha range CURVE.JPG again not my image but if you are looking at hydrogen galaxies or even solar flares then this is the minute range you are considering capturing.
 
B

Brian

Senior Member
Scott Murray said:
There could even be

RGBW found in some Kodak's ;-)
Click to expand...

i saw that on the Truesense site, they are calling it sparsely populated color arrays for better resolution and low-light performance.

My DCS200 is the first Infrared camera in the Digital Science series- hence the reason why I called them. The engineer laughed that I was having them undo years of work to make Digital sensors have a response closer to film. I ended up writing my own raw converter to get back the columns and rows used for the color interpolation that was no longer needed. I dug that code out to modify the Df .NEF files so that LR4 would process them as D4 files.
 
Last edited:
B

Brian

Senior Member
The original post has been deleted due to copyright infringement. I guess the information posted was not the work of the OP.

Is there any point in just not deleting the entire thread?
 
D

Don Kuykendall_RIP

RIP :(
Brian said:
The original post has been deleted due to copyright infringement. I guess the information posted was not the work of the OP.

Is there any point in just not deleting the entire thread?
Click to expand...

We need for people to know that posting copyrighted material is not allowed on this site. A short quote from a site is OK as long as it is cited correctly. There was nothing that said that this was anything other than the OP's work. The forum and the owner of the forum could get in big trouble for that.
 
Top