Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D600/D610
D600 Lens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cowboybillybob1" data-source="post: 130439" data-attributes="member: 11894"><p>I don't want to hijack this thread and think the OP would do well with the 50mm 1.8 prime as a first FX lens.</p><p></p><p>I was going to buy the 17 -35mm 2.8 Nikon lens. It seems the extra mm to 35mm will make it much more versitile than the 14-24. It sort of makes it more capable than doing just landscape stuff. I was also thinking of returning a Sigma 24-70 in favor of a similar Nikon, "The Beast", a 28-70 2.8.</p><p></p><p>The Sigma really is an excellent lens and at $850 it's a great buy. Is the Nikon 28-70 that much better at about $1700?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cowboybillybob1, post: 130439, member: 11894"] I don't want to hijack this thread and think the OP would do well with the 50mm 1.8 prime as a first FX lens. I was going to buy the 17 -35mm 2.8 Nikon lens. It seems the extra mm to 35mm will make it much more versitile than the 14-24. It sort of makes it more capable than doing just landscape stuff. I was also thinking of returning a Sigma 24-70 in favor of a similar Nikon, "The Beast", a 28-70 2.8. The Sigma really is an excellent lens and at $850 it's a great buy. Is the Nikon 28-70 that much better at about $1700? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D600/D610
D600 Lens
Top
