+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member

    70-300mm, 4-5.6 vs 4.5-6.3

    The (AF Zoom-NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4-5.6G [FX 62mm])
    Costs half as much as the (AF-P DX NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3G ED [DX 62mm])
    What's the big difference here, it appears (to me) the better overall lens is the 4-5.6, bigger lens, wider aperture, fits FX and DX (if I'm reading correctly), not a camera expert so idk, just looks better to me

    › See More: 70-300mm, 4-5.6 vs 4.5-6.3

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Needa's Avatar

    Re: 70-300mm, 4-5.6 vs 4.5-6.3

    The AF-P Has limited compatibility on your D7200. I believe the incompatibility is you will not be able to switch off VR on the VR model. The P is for pulsed or stepper focus motor which is quieter.
    Thanks/Like RocketCowboy Thanks/liked this post

  3. #3
    Senior Member

    Re: 70-300mm, 4-5.6 vs 4.5-6.3

    So the FX lens would be an overall better option for the D7200?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Needa's Avatar

    Re: 70-300mm, 4-5.6 vs 4.5-6.3

    Here is some discussion around the differences.


    I have the AF-S 70-300 but have no experience with the P version.

  5. #5
    Senior Member

    Re: 70-300mm, 4-5.6 vs 4.5-6.3

    I like that the AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor
    70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED has a 67mm lens, for some reason small ones like the 58mm seem kinda cheap to me, just trying to justify spend 4x as much on the AF-S for 500$ instead of 120$ on the FX

  6. #6
    Challenge Team
    Super Mod
    RocketCowboy's Avatar

    Re: 70-300mm, 4-5.6 vs 4.5-6.3

    Quote Originally Posted by Karn View Post
    So the FX lens would be an overall better option for the D7200?
    The FX lens will support all functionality that the lens offers, on your D7200. As mentioned, the biggest issue with the AF-P lens is that VR control is not on the lens body, but set in camera. Since your camera doesnít understand how to do that, youíre basically stuck with VR on all the time. That may not be an issue, but it also might be if you stay locked down on a tripod with that lens a lot.

    I here the IQ on the AF-P lens is great. It has the advantage of technology improvements to help out. On the long end though, itís f/6.3 vs f/5.6. As you also mentioned, itís a DX only lens, vs the older unit that will still work if you plan to upgrade down the road.

    I have the FX version and have been happy with it. It can be soft on the long end, but as a travel lens, it works for my needs.

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Thanks/Like Don Kuykendall Thanks/liked this post
    Charlie, aka RocketCowboy

    Up For A Challenge??? Join the Weekly Photo Challenge!!!

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Texas's Avatar

    Re: 70-300mm, 4-5.6 vs 4.5-6.3

    I've not seen the much advertised softness of my FX VR version on my D7100 but then again my eyes are not what they used to be.
    D750, D90, D100, Nikon 1 J5
    (Once owned: EL, F2AS, D50, D200, D300s, and D7100)

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    grandpaw's Avatar

    Re: 70-300mm, 4-5.6 vs 4.5-6.3

    70-300mm, 4-5.6 vs 4.5-6.3
    I took this back in 2009 on a Nikon D90 with the Nikon70-300F4.5-5.6G VR and it looks fine to me.This was handheld and check out the back legs.I wasn't very far away so the DOF isn't much.

    70-300mm, 4-5.6 vs 4.5-6.3-_dsc0321.jpg
    Last edited by grandpaw; 01-29-2018 at 12:35 AM.
    Best Answers Texas voted best answer for this post
    Remember, before you post a picture, "You are known by what you show, not by what you throw".

    I decided many years ago I was going to have either
    a really good day or sometimes slip to just a good day. I refuse to have bad ones!!!

    Check out my website HERE

Quick Reply Quick Reply

If you are already a member, please login above before posting.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts