+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    Junior Member

    Any other shutter remote than the ML-L3?

    I'm looking to find a remote shutter release other than the ML-L3, which I have. It's not as reliable and immediate as I want. Also, I don't want to have to use it in front of the camera. But I can't find *any* remote that is compatible with the D3400.
    Has anyone had luck finding anything? Or am I stuck with the ML-L3 until I change camera bodies?


    › See More: Any other shutter remote than the ML-L3?



  2. #2
    Senior Member
    mikew's Avatar

    Re: Any other shutter remote than the ML-L3?

    I find it strange i can find this one so would have thought you should be able to get a wireless one but i can only find corded,its looking like this info is incorrect so check before purchase

    Any other shutter remote than the ML-L3?Remote Control Shutter Release Nikon D600 D610 D800 D810 D750 D3300 D3400 D5500 | eBay

    Last edited by mikew; 09-13-2017 at 06:43 PM.
    Mike

    Nikon D500,Sigma 100-400,Sigma 105 macro

    Nikon 1 V2,FT-1,10-30mm 30-110mm Viltrox extension tubes

    Olympus EM10 MK11,14-42,40-150








  3. #3
    Senior Member
    mikew's Avatar

    Re: Any other shutter remote than the ML-L3?

    Sorry.welcome to the forum
    Mike

    Nikon D500,Sigma 100-400,Sigma 105 macro

    Nikon 1 V2,FT-1,10-30mm 30-110mm Viltrox extension tubes

    Olympus EM10 MK11,14-42,40-150








  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Bikerbrent's Avatar

    Re: Any other shutter remote than the ML-L3?

    Welcome aboard. Enjoy the ride.
    We look forward to seeing more posts and samples of your work.

    It appears that an IR remote like the ML-L3 is the only remote option for a D3400. From what I can see, it supports no wired remotes.
    Brent: Poway, CA
    D7200, D200, D70, F100
    Tokina 12-24mm
    Nikon 18-200mm
    Nikon 18-70mm
    Tokina 28-70mm f2.6-2.8
    Nikon 80-200mm f2.8
    Sigma 150-600mm
    Nikon 50 AF f1.8
    Tokina 100mm f2.8 Macro
    Nikon SB800

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    hark's Avatar

    Re: Any other shutter remote than the ML-L3?

    Is there any reason why something like a Vello wireless remote trigger and receiver won't work? Some of them tend to cost less than $50. Would they be compatible?
    Cindy
    Flickr
    and
    My 2017 Thread
    Where the Spirit does not work with the hand, there is no art
    -- Leonardo da Vinci

    Nikon 14mm f/2.8; Nikon 16mm f/2.8 fisheye; Nikon 85mm f/1.8G; Nikon 105 f/2.8G micro VR; Nikon 180mm f/2.8; Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S
    Nikon 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G; Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8; Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRII; Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G VR


  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Bikerbrent's Avatar

    Re: Any other shutter remote than the ML-L3?

    Quote Originally Posted by hark View Post
    Is there any reason why something like a Vello wireless remote trigger and receiver won't work? Some of them tend to cost less than $50. Would they be compatible?
    No, it won't work because Nikon dropped the connection port. See

    Nikon d3400 remote shutter help?? | Photography Forum
    Brent: Poway, CA
    D7200, D200, D70, F100
    Tokina 12-24mm
    Nikon 18-200mm
    Nikon 18-70mm
    Tokina 28-70mm f2.6-2.8
    Nikon 80-200mm f2.8
    Sigma 150-600mm
    Nikon 50 AF f1.8
    Tokina 100mm f2.8 Macro
    Nikon SB800

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    hark's Avatar

    Re: Any other shutter remote than the ML-L3?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bikerbrent View Post
    No, it won't work because Nikon dropped the connection port. See

    Nikon d3400 remote shutter help?? | Photography Forum
    If that is the case, I found the Amazon Basics wireless remote to work a little better than the Nikon although it also missed once in a while. I found that holding the remote up close from behind worked better.

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...?ie=UTF8&psc=1
    Cindy
    Flickr
    and
    My 2017 Thread
    Where the Spirit does not work with the hand, there is no art
    -- Leonardo da Vinci

    Nikon 14mm f/2.8; Nikon 16mm f/2.8 fisheye; Nikon 85mm f/1.8G; Nikon 105 f/2.8G micro VR; Nikon 180mm f/2.8; Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S
    Nikon 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G; Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8; Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRII; Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G VR


  8. #8
    Senior Member
    lokatz's Avatar

    Re: Any other shutter remote than the ML-L3?

    I think this may simply be an issue of where to hold the remote rather than how well it works. Keep in mind that this is not radio control: all remotes for the D3400 and several other Nikons use Infrared, which essentially means light. If there is no direct line of sight between your remote and the IR receiver built into your camera, well, it's not going to work well, because in that case you can only rely on reflections in hopes of the camera getting triggered.

    Take a look at your camera's manual: the IR receiver sits on the FRONT, in the middle of the hand grip area. That means triggering from close behind is not very useful. Instead, hold the remote somewhere off the front side of your camera, just outside of the lens' viewing angle, and it should trigger every single time. I own two ML-L3's and never had a problem with them.

    The question why Nikon puts the receiver on the front of the camera puzzles me, though. Like you, DinoExMachina, I don't like having to trigger shots from the front.
    Last edited by lokatz; 09-13-2017 at 10:04 PM.
    Lothar Katz

    Nikon D700, D500, D7100, 200-500 f/5.6, 300 f/4 PF, 55-200 f/4-5.6, 50mm f/1.8 - Tamron 60 f/2 Macro - Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4 - Tokina 12-28 f/4 - Yongnou YN568 - Panasonic TZ101 (a.k.a. ZN100) - Photoshop CS6 - Lightroom 6 - DXO PhotoLab - Aurora HDR 2018


  9. #9
    Senior Member
    mikew's Avatar

    Re: Any other shutter remote than the ML-L3?

    Quote Originally Posted by lokatz View Post
    I think this may simply be an issue of where to hold the remote rather than how well it works. Keep in mind that this is not radio control: all remotes for the D3400 and several other Nikons use Infrared, which essentially means light. If there is no direct line of sight between your remote and the IR receiver built into your camera, well, it's not going to work well, because in that case you can only rely on reflections in hopes of the camera getting triggered.

    Take a look at your camera's manual: the IR receiver sits on the FRONT, in the middle of the hand grip area. That means triggering from close behind is not very useful. Instead, hold the remote somewhere off the front side of your camera, just outside of the lens' viewing angle, and it should trigger every single time. I own two ML-L3's and never had a problem with them.

    The question why Nikon puts the receiver on the front of the camera puzzles me, though. Like you, DinoExMachina, I don't like having to trigger shots from the front.


    For those private husband and wife pictures possibly
    Mike

    Nikon D500,Sigma 100-400,Sigma 105 macro

    Nikon 1 V2,FT-1,10-30mm 30-110mm Viltrox extension tubes

    Olympus EM10 MK11,14-42,40-150








  10. #10
    Junior Member

    Re: Any other shutter remote than the ML-L3?

    I've experienced this as well. I can never get the wireless remote to work reliably

    Sent from my SM-J727V using Tapatalk





Quick Reply Quick Reply

If you are already a member, please login above before posting.

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •