Hi all, I hope i can ask the proper question and have a decent answer and better understanding of this issue i am having, and quite frankly not sure if its a problem.
Shooting with d3400 with kit lens 18-55mm and 70-300mm Raw. i just seen that my image sizes with my kit lenses are 6000 x 4000. Now, i bought the 35mm lens and i seen a significant difference in sizes.
kit lenses = 6000 x 4000 and average image size is around 10 mb.
35mm lens = 1500 x1000 and average image size of less than 1mb.
i only shoot RAW so not much adjustments in that part for the d3400. Also i use lightroom and always export with highest quality of a 100.
So i guess my question is why different dimensions and significant difference in size of mb between the kit lenses and the 35mm prime?
i tried to do a lot of reading on it but i seem to get even more confused, if anybody can understand my issue and help me out would be very nice. thanks guys
Shooting with d3400 with kit lens 18-55mm and 70-300mm Raw. i just seen that my image sizes with my kit lenses are 6000 x 4000. Now, i bought the 35mm lens and i seen a significant difference in sizes.
kit lenses = 6000 x 4000 and average image size is around 10 mb.
35mm lens = 1500 x1000 and average image size of less than 1mb.
i only shoot RAW so not much adjustments in that part for the d3400. Also i use lightroom and always export with highest quality of a 100.
So i guess my question is why different dimensions and significant difference in size of mb between the kit lenses and the 35mm prime?
i tried to do a lot of reading on it but i seem to get even more confused, if anybody can understand my issue and help me out would be very nice. thanks guys