+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1. #21
    Senior Member

    Re: D3300 Picture quality not satisfied.

    Quote Originally Posted by Horoscope Fish View Post
    I'd need to look at the original RAW file to determine anything more.
    .....
    Thanks . How do I send you 18MB file? Can I please have your email address?


    › See More: D3300 Picture quality not satisfied.



  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Horoscope Fish's Avatar

    Re: D3300 Picture quality not satisfied.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lalam View Post
    Thanks . How do I send you 18MB file?
    You'd need to upload it somewhere, like Dropbox, so I could download it.
    ....
    ~ Paul
    ....
    ....
    Primary Kit :: D850, Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 G2, Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 G2, Sigma 135mm f/1.8 Art, Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art,
    Godox Flashes & Triggers, Manfrotto X055PROB, 3-Legged Thing Airhed II... All Stuffed into a Manfrotto Pro Backpack 50
    ....
    ....
    ● ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ๑۩۩๑ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ●

  3. #23
    Senior Member

    Re: D3300 Picture quality not satisfied.

    Image with in camera sharpening setting.....https://www.dropbox.com/s/tbngjvk9br..._3185.NEF?dl=0

    Image with in camera sharpening zero.........https://www.dropbox.com/s/hasobgrte7..._3149.NEF?dl=0
    Last edited by Lalam; 06-03-2015 at 05:56 PM.

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Horoscope Fish's Avatar

    Re: D3300 Picture quality not satisfied.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lalam View Post
    Image with in camera sharpening setting.....https://www.dropbox.com/s/tbngjvk9br..._3185.NEF?dl=0

    Image with in camera sharpening zero..........https://www.dropbox.com/sh/h1dt7myha...ZVrAPbP_a?dl=0
    Downloading now... Give me a few to look them over.

    Edit: Your first file downloaded just fine... The second one has the following name: KR2014TableACombined.pdf and appears to be a calendar of some sort, not a RAW file.

    New Edit: Here's my version of your in-camera sharpened original. I imported the RAW file into Photoshop via Adobe Camera RAW and adjusted the exposure, vibrance and saturation a bit. ACR automatically adds a small amount of sharpening but not much and I left that setting at its default. I did not alter the white balance or correct the color.

    The image was then resized to 100% and a random 5:7 crop was made. That crop was then resized to 1000 pixels on the long edge and saved as a JPG. This is the result:
    .....
    D3300 Picture quality not satisfied.-sharpening-cropped-version.jpg
    ....
    My personal opinion is that this shot is fine as far as sharpening goes, it certainly doesn't appear OVER sharpened to me. I think the shot would benefit from some real post processing but the sharpness, to me, does not appear to be a problem at all.
    ....
    Last edited by Horoscope Fish; 06-03-2015 at 06:18 PM.
    ~ Paul
    ....
    ....
    Primary Kit :: D850, Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 G2, Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 G2, Sigma 135mm f/1.8 Art, Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art,
    Godox Flashes & Triggers, Manfrotto X055PROB, 3-Legged Thing Airhed II... All Stuffed into a Manfrotto Pro Backpack 50
    ....
    ....
    ● ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ๑۩۩๑ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ●

  5. #25
    Senior Member

    Re: D3300 Picture quality not satisfied.

    Quote Originally Posted by Horoscope Fish View Post

    Edit: Your first file downloaded just fine... The second one has the following name: KR2014TableACombined.pdf and appears to be a calendar of some sort, not a RAW file.
    ....
    It was wrongly attached. Now edited the post and attached another image . Can you see difference in the skies in both? On my pc sky in the original of the one you edited looks over sharpened. Thanks for the reply.
    Last edited by Lalam; 06-03-2015 at 06:45 PM.

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Horoscope Fish's Avatar

    Re: D3300 Picture quality not satisfied.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lalam View Post
    It was wrongly attached. Now edited the post and attached another image . Can you see difference in the skies in both? On my pc sky in the original of the one you edited looks over sharpened. Thanks for the reply.
    Well I've looked them over and they simply don't look over-sharpened to me; but, that being said, if they look over-sharpened to YOU, then I'd say that's what matters.
    ....
    Thanks/Like Lalam Thanks/liked this post
     
    ~ Paul
    ....
    ....
    Primary Kit :: D850, Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 G2, Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 G2, Sigma 135mm f/1.8 Art, Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art,
    Godox Flashes & Triggers, Manfrotto X055PROB, 3-Legged Thing Airhed II... All Stuffed into a Manfrotto Pro Backpack 50
    ....
    ....
    ● ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ๑۩۩๑ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ●

  7. #27
    Senior Member

    Re: D3300 Picture quality not satisfied.

    Quote Originally Posted by Horoscope Fish View Post
    Wel they simply don't look over-sharpened to me; but, that being said, if they look over-sharpened to YOU, then I'd say that's what matters.
    ....
    Thanks. I have again brought back the sharpness level of camera to zero. Shall be experimenting few more.

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Scott Murray's Avatar

    Re: D3300 Picture quality not satisfied.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ta2Dave View Post
    I understand that, I'm curious if the raw files in raw+jpeg are different than just shooting raw.

    I like the capture program, and I've been playing with raw therapee as well.
    Quote Originally Posted by Horoscope Fish View Post
    The RAW files will be the same either way. Shooting RAW + JPG just means you'll have two copies of each shot; one will have been processed by your camera (JPG) one wlll require that you process it (RAW).
    Sorry been away camping, thanks Paul for clarifying that.





Quick Reply Quick Reply

If you are already a member, please login above before posting.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •