dudamel
New member
Hi guys. I recently sold my beloved beginner D90 and got the D7000 + 18-105 for a fairly good price.
I already own the 35mm 1.8G, and was getting lovely results, very happy with it.
The thing is, im thinking on selling both 18-105 + 35mm, to get 35-70 2.8.
I mainly use the prime for my work (almost 80%) (portraits, landscapes and some street), but not for the focal length, just for the fast f/2. I've already owned the 18-105 and was primarily sitting on my backpack almost all the time.
Doing this makes me get closer to the subject by foot, i could really use that extra zoom as long as i keep the f2.8.
If i get the 35-70, which has f2.8 (almost close to that f/2 on 35mm), would i notice a huge difference on sharpness or image quality?.
I mean, using both on 35mm, f2.8 , is there a substantial difference?
Thanks in advance.
I already own the 35mm 1.8G, and was getting lovely results, very happy with it.
The thing is, im thinking on selling both 18-105 + 35mm, to get 35-70 2.8.
I mainly use the prime for my work (almost 80%) (portraits, landscapes and some street), but not for the focal length, just for the fast f/2. I've already owned the 18-105 and was primarily sitting on my backpack almost all the time.
Doing this makes me get closer to the subject by foot, i could really use that extra zoom as long as i keep the f2.8.
If i get the 35-70, which has f2.8 (almost close to that f/2 on 35mm), would i notice a huge difference on sharpness or image quality?.
I mean, using both on 35mm, f2.8 , is there a substantial difference?
Thanks in advance.