And the thing about photography and which has been a recent debate, I for one think if we get it all right. Light, exposure, ISO etc. we do nothing in post and end up with a keeper, or we under expose and end up with shit, or we over expose and end up with shit. What is your preference?
I think it's a matter of personal preference and habit. Anyone having shot SLR knows that there was less to little room for error when taking the shot, especially when you didn't do darkroom. Today it is a different matter and with the technology present, in the cam and as software, there's more room for error except at certain levels.
I know both world, the not so forgiving past and the forgivable present. Yet I am practical about it. What matters to me is getting the shot and getting the data but I prefer to put my main focus on the shot itself. I don't bother about white balance, contrast, saturation etc because I know I can do that afterwards as easy and as good as before. The less I have to waste time with, the more there is to shoot. I managed to move ISO to post too and if in the future even more can be done in post, I will do so.
What I find relevant is framing the shot, getting the focus, finding the composition and have a good time while doing. All the rest was relevant because I had no choice in the past. Now I do, and I prefer to make those decision while hanging on my couch drinking coffee.
But to each their own.
.
