Samsung is putting out another Android Galaxy camera, the NX

jdeg

^ broke something
Staff member
I really like the fact that Samsung is paving the way for Android powered cameras, however I don't like the fact that their latest camera, the Galaxy NX, is $1700!!

81GFUdJ9u0L._SL1500_.jpg
71aMkpLeWUL._SL1500_.jpg

Granted, it has some pretty neat features, like:
  • Mirrorless design
  • 20.3mp CMOS
  • Android 4.2 JB
  • 4.8 inch 720p touch s
  • ISO 100-25,600
  • 8.6fps
  • 3g/4g cellular data, wi-fi

Engadget did a good review on it here: Samsung Galaxy NX review: an overpriced Android-powered mirrorless camera

​What do you think?
 

jdeg

^ broke something
Staff member
Ok, now I have seen it all. I wonder how long the battery last.

From the Engadget review:
I spent the day exploring Shanghai, returning to the hotel nine hours later with a 32 percent charge remaining. When you factor in the Google Maps browsing, emailing, Instagram sharing, Foursquare check-ins, 128 photos and nearly three minutes of 1080p video I was able to capture along the way, that's solid performance. Of course, I'd expect nothing less from a 4,360mAh battery pack, but it's great to see that Samsung planned ahead here.
 

Bob Blaylock

Senior Member
I think that in this camera, we're seeing a bit of the future. I don't know how far into the future, but I am sure this is a glimpse of what is coming.

Two key points.

First, at this time, and for longer than I've been alive, and probably for a few years yet to come; when it comes to serious photography, the SLR is king. What sets the SLR apart from all other cameras is how the viewfinder works. Uniquely, it gives the photographer a direct view of what the camera is truly seeing; or at least a much better view than any other sort of viewfinder at this time is able to offer.

I am sure that eventually, a purely electronic viewfinder, such as this camera has, will be superior to a true SLR viewfinder. We're not there, yet, but I have little doubt that I will live to see it. When we reach that point, I expect to see the true SLR become obsolete, as there will no longer remain any good reason for the cost, mechanical complexity, and potential maintenance issues that pertain to an SLR.


The other point is the use of an operating system like Android, that allows the user to freely install and use third-party software for taking, postprocessing, and distributing/sharing pictures beyond what is native to the camera. This also has a way to go, yet. The review mentions that from a cold power-on, this Samsung camera takes about half a minute to boot. That's a pretty serious shortcoming, but one that can surely be overcome as we get faster and more powerful processors and storage devices on which to base such a camera. Also mentioned, is that many of the third-party applications available to run on Android will not handle pictures as large as this camera takes; again, this is an issue that time and technological advancement will surely correct, as such devices come with more memory, more processing power, and applications that are developed to take advantage thereof.


Cost is also a serious issue. At $1700, this camera is just too expensive for its capabilities. For much less than that, you can get a nice DSLR that will be ready almost immediately when you flip on the power switch, and will take better pictures.

Somewhere down the road, I expect that what will be sold to serious photographers will be a descendant of cameras like this Samsung, with electronic viewfinders that are better than is possible with an SLR, that run Android or some similar operating system on a processor that is fast enough to boot it from a cold start in what, to a human, will seem as instantaneous as turning on a DSLR of the current time period, will have a large collection of third-party applications specifically written and optimized to run on such cameras, and will cost less than what a comparable DSLR would cost if they were still being made.
 

Vincent

Senior Member
Anybody getting exited about the Samsung NX1?

First feedback is that it is good and with the fastest AF seen, from what I saw on the NX30 we can expect a real good image quality.
One of the issues remains the lenses, but also there the new 16-50 2-2.8 and the 50-150 2.8 seem promising.

I personally want to see the DXO Mark scores first, but maybe Samsung is becoming more and more serious about sturring up the camera market.

P.S.: on flickr the most pictures are from Apple, Canon, Nikon, Samsung, Sony in that order.
 

Pretzel

Senior Member
haha, actually it doesn't have voice, just data. Although I'm sure you could get skype or Google hangouts working.

Excuse me, sir? No pictures, sir.

*silence*

SIR! NO pictures! Do you hear me? No pictures allowed!

*silence*

SIR! PUT THE CAMERA AWAY NOW! *handcuffs jangling here*

"Oh.... what? ME!? Sorry, I was just playing Clash of Clans on my camera here..."
 
Top