Patent for Nikon Mirrorless FX Camera

SkvLTD

Senior Member
If that might mean crazy-fast AF/ridiculous ISO capability and ability to still use our current glass, it would be something.
 

traceyjj

Senior Member
Hope it doesnt stop the R&D of DSLRs, and lets us use our existing lenses with no adaptor/loss of speed.

I dont want mirrorless... if I did I would've stayed with Olympus.
 

mikew_RIP

Senior Member
Hope it doesnt stop the R&D of DSLRs, and lets us use our existing lenses with no adaptor/loss of speed.

I dont want mirrorless... if I did I would've stayed with Olympus.


An adapter isnt a problem if its the same principal as the 1 range,its just an intelligent tube that replaces the distance from the sensor to the lens rear element which could be a lot shorter if you dont need the extra depth of a mirror box,you would lose nothing no speed loss no focus loss no change in focal length and no features you now have on a DSLR,the only thing you may lose using existing lenses are some of the more advanced features of the new camera.
 

AC016

Senior Member
Indeed, an adapter would have to be used on a new FF mirrorless camera from Nikon. None of the current Nikon glass would be able to function correctly otherwise. Obviously, that would mean Nikon would have to come out with a new line of glass or subject users to forever be using an adapter. I think they will do both, it makes sense. Seeing that it is but a patent, it will be a few years before we see anything materialize on this, if ever. In other words, don't hold your breath. If they get the camera bang on in regards to specs,features,ergonomics & price (in other words, make someone feel like they have a D750 in their hands, without thinking that it's actually mirrorless), they can kiss a large chunk of their DSLR business goodbye. I won't hang around and watch paint dry though. I rather go and watch the likes of Fuji, Oly, Panasonic and Sony move ahead in leaps & bounds.
 

mikew_RIP

Senior Member
Does a pro mirrorless camera have to be smaller than a DSLR if not take away the shutter add some fancy electrics and an evf you could have a body that would take DSLR lenses,just wondering if the pro wants a smaller body.they could test the water with a pro grade DX call it a D400.::what::
 

AC016

Senior Member
Does a pro mirrorless camera have to be smaller than a DSLR if not take away the shutter add some fancy electrics and an evf you could have a body that would take DSLR lenses,just wondering if the pro wants a smaller body.they could test the water with a pro grade DX call it a D400.::what::

It's a given that it will be smaller. Once you take that bulky mirror box out along with the AF and the penta prism, the camera will get skinnier. Unless you fill the camera with voids in the body, it will be smaller.
 
Last edited:

Panza

Senior Member
Hope it doesnt stop the R&D of DSLRs, and lets us use our existing lenses with no adaptor/loss of speed.

I dont want mirrorless... if I did I would've stayed with Olympus.
Kodak had the monopoly on film ... they also had some of the first patents on Digital SLR's but they didn't really push for the technology because they were afraid that Digital technology would cannibalize their film revenues. By the time they caught on and pushed their digital cameras 20 years after their first patent, Canon and Nikon already had a strong foothold in the market and sales of Kodak went from billions to millions. :x

A new format of lenses means more revenue from older / newer generation less pressed to look into older options and an adapter usually keeps oldies happy enough to use their old systems.

Does a pro mirrorless camera have to be smaller than a DSLR if not take away the shutter add some fancy electrics and an evf you could have a body that would take DSLR lenses,just wondering if the pro wants a smaller body.they could test the water with a pro grade DX call it a D400.::what::
The Sony A77 and A99 are in essence, pro mirrorless cameras that are DSLR sized. They have a translucent mirror which doesn't move which allows them to have real-time EVF and monitors. They also take DSLR lenses from the former A-mount Minolta/Sony lenses. Still have crappy 400-500 shot battery life though.
 

Panza

Senior Member
Forgot to throw in my 0.02 that I'm excited for Nikon's FF Mirrorless camera. I've been a loyal Nikon owner for many years and I've a lot of Nikon gear but traveling with a DSLR can be a hassle. I looked at the Nikon1 series but the small sensor did not appeal to me what-so-ever (even with the wide variety of lenses). I started using my Sony FF camera for travel/everyday use and it transitioned to my second/main camera for some professional applications; the quality of product is strong. If Nikon enters the ring for FF mirrorless I'll probably be one of the first in the bandwagon to try it out. ;)
 

sonicbuffalo_RIP

Senior Member
Forgot to throw in my 0.02 that I'm excited for Nikon's FF Mirrorless camera. I've been a loyal Nikon owner for many years and I've a lot of Nikon gear but traveling with a DSLR can be a hassle. I looked at the Nikon1 series but the small sensor did not appeal to me what-so-ever (even with the wide variety of lenses). I started using my Sony FF camera for travel/everyday use and it transitioned to my second/main camera for some professional applications; the quality of product is strong. If Nikon enters the ring for FF mirrorless I'll probably be one of the first in the bandwagon to try it out. ;)

Lets see what the specs are....and it hasn't been announced yet anyway. Time will tell.
 

everprentice

Senior Member
I have been looking at mirrorless cameras and their designs. I haven't really gone into features since I know it doesn't take a lot of bells and whistles to create a beautiful image. What I am more interested in is figuring out how they would feel in the hand. Ever since I purchased a couple of D300s I realized the one of the major differences of the pro bodies from the consumer grades is the design. They are functional and highly evolved (for a lack of a better term). The buttons and switches that allow you to shift settings and modes are purposely and intelligently laid out to aid the shooter in the field. It feels more like a machine than an electronic device.

Mirrorless cameras with their compact form factor have one thing in common- the lack of buttons and switches. I hope Nikon won't omit these when they design their FF mirrorless. I also hope they revisit the P7000/P71000 in the design of future compact Nikon mirrorless cameras. I think their design is brilliant.

Sure the phone in my camera takes awesome photos but I always hate it when I have to go through a menu to change settings. It is kinda reminiscent of my days using the D40/D40x.

So for me, until they come up with a body that have these incorporated in the design I will keep on lifting Nikon heavyweights. (And I hope the don't forget that red triangular piece below the shutter button.)
 
Top