Sigma ART 24-35mm F/2 DG HSM is SHARP and impressive.

D200freak

Senior Member
It's not a lens that (currently) fits into my needs or wants, but today I got to spend some time using a Sigma Art series 24-35mm F2 (2, not 2.8) DG HSM lens with my D800. Set to full size and raw, of course, I played around with it inside the store and stepped outside for some photos as well.

Without boring you (or exciting you) with the details, here's my impression:

WOW.

It's razor sharp from corner to corner, geometry is very well controlled, and there is a definite crispness to the image that I think anybody who's looking for a lens in this range would appreciate.

For a lens that lists for 999 dollars, I'd say that if you're looking for prime quality images but want a short zoom range around 24 to 35mm, this one is well worth looking into. Why get a 24mm prime and a 35mm prime when you could get this and get the same image quality (and, maybe, better) with some zoom range in between, and only spend a thousand bucks or less to get it?

I'd prefer that my glass should say Nikon on it. But to buy the three best Nikon primes in the same range, at 24, 28, and 35mm, you're looking at spending at least 2000 dollars for the "closest match" F/1.8 lenses, and to get the best Nikon primes (F/1.4, except the 28 which only goes down to 1.8 at best) then you end up with three lenses, none of which have VR. And not all of these even have the silent wave motor focusing system.

The build quality of the Art lens is really something, too. Metal construction, fine machining and workmanship, I'm half tempted to buy the lens just because it's so well made and does its job so well.


If you're looking to buy some prime lenses in the 24-35mm range, I suggest you check out this lens, too, before you make your final decision.
 

RocketCowboy

Senior Member
It's not a lens that (currently) fits into my needs or wants, but today I got to spend some time using a Sigma Art series 24-35mm F2 (2, not 2.8) DG HSM lens with my D800. Set to full size and raw, of course, I played around with it inside the store and stepped outside for some photos as well.

Without boring you (or exciting you) with the details, here's my impression:

WOW.

It's razor sharp from corner to corner, geometry is very well controlled, and there is a definite crispness to the image that I think anybody who's looking for a lens in this range would appreciate.

For a lens that lists for 999 dollars, I'd say that if you're looking for prime quality images but want a short zoom range around 24 to 35mm, this one is well worth looking into. Why get a 24mm prime and a 35mm prime when you could get this and get the same image quality (and, maybe, better) with some zoom range in between, and only spend a thousand bucks or less to get it?

I'd prefer that my glass should say Nikon on it. But to buy the three best Nikon primes in the same range, at 24, 28, and 35mm, you're looking at spending at least 2000 dollars for the "closest match" F/1.8 lenses, and to get the best Nikon primes (F/1.4, except the 28 which only goes down to 1.8 at best) then you end up with three lenses, none of which have VR. And not all of these even have the silent wave motor focusing system.

The build quality of the Art lens is really something, too. Metal construction, fine machining and workmanship, I'm half tempted to buy the lens just because it's so well made and does its job so well.


If you're looking to buy some prime lenses in the 24-35mm range, I suggest you check out this lens, too, before you make your final decision.

Great review, thanks!

If that lens went a little wider, I would probably be seriously tempted.
 

D200freak

Senior Member
I might be as well. But I think that there's GOT to be a trade-off between image qualities and range of zoom, and Sigma decided to restrict this lens to a quality level that makes you think about buying this lens rather than any primes between 24 and 35mm.

Shooting raw, anywhere in its range, the details get down to a single row of pixels, or finer, with a D800.
 

BackdoorArts

Senior Member
For a lens that lists for 999 dollars, I'd say that if you're looking for prime quality images but want a short zoom range around 24 to 35mm, this one is well worth looking into. Why get a 24mm prime and a 35mm prime when you could get this and get the same image quality (and, maybe, better) with some zoom range in between, and only spend a thousand bucks or less to get it?

This is why I'm seriously considering this, even though I have the 16-35mm. I have the 28mm f1.8 and wish the 24mm was available when I got it. If it has a little more range or I did more night sky stuff I'd be all over this. I've got some stuff going up for sale and this is on the list of stuff I'd spend that on. Thanks for the review.
 

RocketCowboy

Senior Member
This is why I'm seriously considering this, even though I have the 16-35mm. I have the 28mm f1.8 and wish the 24mm was available when I got it. If it has a little more range or I did more night sky stuff I'd be all over this. I've got some stuff going up for sale and this is on the list of stuff I'd spend that on. Thanks for the review.

That's my challenge too...I've got the 16-35 so one would have to go to make room for the other.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top