Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Tamron 70-300 vs Nikon 55-300mm for D3100
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rick M" data-source="post: 40586" data-attributes="member: 4399"><p>At $249, it is the best in it's class at that price point. Many people have paid full price and are very happy. It is a Dx lens so the draw back is you can't use it on a full frame camera. It is similar to the 55-200, but I believe it has a metal mount which is an upgrade (nowadays anyway!). The next best nikon would be the 70-300vr at over $500. If you plan to stay with Dx and are on a budget, without a doubt, get the Nikon at $249.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rick M, post: 40586, member: 4399"] At $249, it is the best in it's class at that price point. Many people have paid full price and are very happy. It is a Dx lens so the draw back is you can't use it on a full frame camera. It is similar to the 55-200, but I believe it has a metal mount which is an upgrade (nowadays anyway!). The next best nikon would be the 70-300vr at over $500. If you plan to stay with Dx and are on a budget, without a doubt, get the Nikon at $249. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Tamron 70-300 vs Nikon 55-300mm for D3100
Top