Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Sigma 17-50 2.8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Felisek" data-source="post: 443878" data-attributes="member: 23887"><p>Well, I can only say that Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 is a great general lens. It sits on my D7100 for most of the time. I find the range 17-50 ideal for most of my work and image quality is excellent. Apparently, Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 is even better, though I never tried it.</p><p></p><p>When I was deciding about buying my general lens, I considered three Sigmas: 18-35 f/1.8, 17-50 f/2.8 and 17-70 f/2.8-4 C. After a lot of thinking I decided that the first one hasn't got enough reach and is too bulky and too heavy, while the third one wouldn't give me enough image quality. The 17-50 seemed like a good compromise.</p><p></p><p>I shot thousands of pictures with it and I'm happy <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Felisek, post: 443878, member: 23887"] Well, I can only say that Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 is a great general lens. It sits on my D7100 for most of the time. I find the range 17-50 ideal for most of my work and image quality is excellent. Apparently, Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 is even better, though I never tried it. When I was deciding about buying my general lens, I considered three Sigmas: 18-35 f/1.8, 17-50 f/2.8 and 17-70 f/2.8-4 C. After a lot of thinking I decided that the first one hasn't got enough reach and is too bulky and too heavy, while the third one wouldn't give me enough image quality. The 17-50 seemed like a good compromise. I shot thousands of pictures with it and I'm happy :D [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Sigma 17-50 2.8
Top