Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 70-300 vr vs Tamron 70-300 vc
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elliot87" data-source="post: 340348" data-attributes="member: 25183"><p>I can't be of any help regarding a direct comparison but I have the Tamron and would recommend it to anyone. All my research suggested they were fairly equal, some saying the Tamron was sharper, others the Nikon. The VC on the Tamron is excellent, in a youtube video I watched recently, Matt Grainger suggested the VC on the 70-300 was better that the VR II on the Nikon 70-200 F2.8! He was shooting handheld down to 1/20 I think.</p><p></p><p>To my eye it is a sharp lens and has thus far exceeded my expectations, albeit with fairly limited use.</p><p>Here's is a JPEG straight out of the camera shot at Fine and Large, again to me it looks plenty sharp enough but I'm no pixel peeper.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]105136[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Not a great picture but I was looking for one I've not tweaked at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elliot87, post: 340348, member: 25183"] I can't be of any help regarding a direct comparison but I have the Tamron and would recommend it to anyone. All my research suggested they were fairly equal, some saying the Tamron was sharper, others the Nikon. The VC on the Tamron is excellent, in a youtube video I watched recently, Matt Grainger suggested the VC on the 70-300 was better that the VR II on the Nikon 70-200 F2.8! He was shooting handheld down to 1/20 I think. To my eye it is a sharp lens and has thus far exceeded my expectations, albeit with fairly limited use. Here's is a JPEG straight out of the camera shot at Fine and Large, again to me it looks plenty sharp enough but I'm no pixel peeper. [ATTACH=CONFIG]105136._xfImport[/ATTACH] Not a great picture but I was looking for one I've not tweaked at all. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 70-300 vr vs Tamron 70-300 vc
Top