Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3100
Hood or filter or both?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="§am" data-source="post: 84629" data-attributes="member: 9187"><p>I don't think too much should be read into the '50 filter' test.</p><p>Putting the whole idea of obscene amount of filters being used, it is not a controlled experiment in the least.</p><p></p><p>To make it even remotely 'scientific' the filters should have been of all the same make and model, and even more from the same batch.</p><p>That alleviates the issue of 'cheaper' filters clouding the results straight away, as no filter would be better or worse then one behind/in front of it.</p><p>Also, the amount of filters produces a barrel/scope/tube effect - was the base image they did without any filters taken with the same tubed affect or just a straight shot from the lens?</p><p>The variables are huge and vast from the 'experiment' they've done that any reading into it, should be taken with a large pinch of salt.</p><p></p><p>The only way you will know if a filter makes a difference is to take a pic with one on, and one without, then sit and pixel by pixel examine the differences.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="§am, post: 84629, member: 9187"] I don't think too much should be read into the '50 filter' test. Putting the whole idea of obscene amount of filters being used, it is not a controlled experiment in the least. To make it even remotely 'scientific' the filters should have been of all the same make and model, and even more from the same batch. That alleviates the issue of 'cheaper' filters clouding the results straight away, as no filter would be better or worse then one behind/in front of it. Also, the amount of filters produces a barrel/scope/tube effect - was the base image they did without any filters taken with the same tubed affect or just a straight shot from the lens? The variables are huge and vast from the 'experiment' they've done that any reading into it, should be taken with a large pinch of salt. The only way you will know if a filter makes a difference is to take a pic with one on, and one without, then sit and pixel by pixel examine the differences. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3100
Hood or filter or both?
Top