Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Feedback
Grainy Skyline... Help Please!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 317845" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>I can't really think of a better way to introduce noise into a shot than to shoot in low light using a high ISO. </p><p></p><p>Suggestions for next time? Invest in a good tripod, a wireless release and keep your ISO as low as possible. I used to do a lot of night photography and routinely used ISO 100 or 200. Digital noise *can* be removed in post processing but the results are often less than ideal. Besides, the less required in post' the better, IMO. Lastly, I noticed a significant drop-off in my success rate when using shutter speeds longer than thirty-seconds; I don't really know why and it could be that it's totally related to my technique and nothing else. That being said, I still suggest you try to keep your shutter speed under thirty-seconds. </p><p></p><p><span style="color: #ffffff">....</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 317845, member: 13090"] I can't really think of a better way to introduce noise into a shot than to shoot in low light using a high ISO. Suggestions for next time? Invest in a good tripod, a wireless release and keep your ISO as low as possible. I used to do a lot of night photography and routinely used ISO 100 or 200. Digital noise *can* be removed in post processing but the results are often less than ideal. Besides, the less required in post' the better, IMO. Lastly, I noticed a significant drop-off in my success rate when using shutter speeds longer than thirty-seconds; I don't really know why and it could be that it's totally related to my technique and nothing else. That being said, I still suggest you try to keep your shutter speed under thirty-seconds. [COLOR=#ffffff]....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Feedback
Grainy Skyline... Help Please!
Top