Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Critique
First attempt using any type of post processing.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 392831" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>You may do whatever you please. If you like saturation, go for it.</p><p></p><p>The reason I prefer vibrance instead is because it only affects the colors that haven't reached their saturation point yet. It's not as drastic in comparison.</p><p></p><p>What I also do lately for my landscapes is slightly S-curve my blue channel. It makes a difference to my skies at the least. I'm not sure if it benefits all since it can have more to do with the region/climate I live. Things don't often "pop" here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 392831, member: 31330"] You may do whatever you please. If you like saturation, go for it. The reason I prefer vibrance instead is because it only affects the colors that haven't reached their saturation point yet. It's not as drastic in comparison. What I also do lately for my landscapes is slightly S-curve my blue channel. It makes a difference to my skies at the least. I'm not sure if it benefits all since it can have more to do with the region/climate I live. Things don't often "pop" here. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Critique
First attempt using any type of post processing.
Top