Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
D750 1 Point Below D610 In DXoMark Scoring
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 370815" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>Nikon has had better sensors for a while. Period. The DxO numbers? They measure one thing on the camera, the sensor's ability to render images under <em>every</em> circumstance. Where they find the differences between that 93 & 94 are the places that I would argue 50% of people with a DSLR <em>never</em> go, and those that do go there do it well less than 2% of the time - with an extremely small exception of pros perhaps living at those extremes. But hey, it's the internet and people need something to argue about.</p><p></p><p>It's like comparing two Bordeaux's that Robert Parker has scored 97 and 98. Is the 98 "better"? Read the full review and about the "bold, heavy currant flavor" of the 98 will have it living its life on the shelf while I buy the other. The devil is in the details, and until you drill into <em>all</em> the measurements behind those scores it's like saying "Well, my amp goes up to 11". For camera bodies the true differentiators are the features, accessories and menu system. Having played with the D750 and D610 side-by-side for 4 days I can truly tell you that the real difference between them has <em>everything</em> to do with things DxO never looks at. And for the things they do, there isn't a thing in the 3 numbers listed that can possibly be differentiated with the human eye unless you're <em>trying</em> to prove one of the differences. </p><p></p><p>Nikon has the top 15, and yet there are <em>so</em> many pros shooting Canon - and even spending their own money on them. Must be because they weren't smart enough to go to college and learn about numbers and just went to art school, because it couldn't be about features Canon has on their bodies that makes life in the field <em>that </em>much easier for a pro. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Anyway, sorry to derail the thread. I now return you to your regularly scheduled discussion of 93 v 94.</p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Nikon rules - Canon drools!!!</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 370815, member: 9240"] Nikon has had better sensors for a while. Period. The DxO numbers? They measure one thing on the camera, the sensor's ability to render images under [I]every[/I] circumstance. Where they find the differences between that 93 & 94 are the places that I would argue 50% of people with a DSLR [I]never[/I] go, and those that do go there do it well less than 2% of the time - with an extremely small exception of pros perhaps living at those extremes. But hey, it's the internet and people need something to argue about. It's like comparing two Bordeaux's that Robert Parker has scored 97 and 98. Is the 98 "better"? Read the full review and about the "bold, heavy currant flavor" of the 98 will have it living its life on the shelf while I buy the other. The devil is in the details, and until you drill into [I]all[/I] the measurements behind those scores it's like saying "Well, my amp goes up to 11". For camera bodies the true differentiators are the features, accessories and menu system. Having played with the D750 and D610 side-by-side for 4 days I can truly tell you that the real difference between them has [I]everything[/I] to do with things DxO never looks at. And for the things they do, there isn't a thing in the 3 numbers listed that can possibly be differentiated with the human eye unless you're [I]trying[/I] to prove one of the differences. Nikon has the top 15, and yet there are [I]so[/I] many pros shooting Canon - and even spending their own money on them. Must be because they weren't smart enough to go to college and learn about numbers and just went to art school, because it couldn't be about features Canon has on their bodies that makes life in the field [I]that [/I]much easier for a pro. ;) Anyway, sorry to derail the thread. I now return you to your regularly scheduled discussion of 93 v 94. [I] Nikon rules - Canon drools!!![/I] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
D750 1 Point Below D610 In DXoMark Scoring
Top