Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7200
D7200 the facts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 423170" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>I would say the improved low-light auto-focus and broader ISO range. The D7200 has a native ISO range of 100-25600, which is 2EV higher than the ISO 100-6400 of the D7100. That, combined with the improved AF system, goes beyond the "nice to have" column, in my opinion... Those are some solid improvements.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No hard facts but I would expect to be waiting a few months *at least*.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The '7200, in my opinion, corrects the one really glaring flaw in it's predecessor and that's the buffer issue. That really does cripple the D7100 in some respects. You can argue not everyone needs a deeper buffer, but the fact is with the D7100 being the "flagship" DX body, the buffer simply should not have been hobbled like it was. The improved ISO and AF system are not to be sneezed at either. As I see it, those are three pretty significant points in favor of the D7200. If I were in the market for a DX body I'd be swayed pretty hard by these upgrades. Still, the D7100 is an outstanding body; the D7200, as you would expect is just a BETTER body but I couldn't assign a specific dollar value to how <em>much</em> better it is.</p><p><span style="color: #FFFFFF">.....</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 423170, member: 13090"] I would say the improved low-light auto-focus and broader ISO range. The D7200 has a native ISO range of 100-25600, which is 2EV higher than the ISO 100-6400 of the D7100. That, combined with the improved AF system, goes beyond the "nice to have" column, in my opinion... Those are some solid improvements. No hard facts but I would expect to be waiting a few months *at least*. The '7200, in my opinion, corrects the one really glaring flaw in it's predecessor and that's the buffer issue. That really does cripple the D7100 in some respects. You can argue not everyone needs a deeper buffer, but the fact is with the D7100 being the "flagship" DX body, the buffer simply should not have been hobbled like it was. The improved ISO and AF system are not to be sneezed at either. As I see it, those are three pretty significant points in favor of the D7200. If I were in the market for a DX body I'd be swayed pretty hard by these upgrades. Still, the D7100 is an outstanding body; the D7200, as you would expect is just a BETTER body but I couldn't assign a specific dollar value to how [I]much[/I] better it is. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"].....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7200
D7200 the facts
Top