Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Low Light & Night
Astrophotograpy and Star Trackers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TwistedThrottle" data-source="post: 742252" data-attributes="member: 46724"><p>Oh and also I got a chance to try Deep Sky Stacker and agree, the images seem to be cleaner than sequator but the program strips EXIF and it takes a lot longer to process. I had one stack I didn't dumb down the stars take 4 hours, (lesson learned)! Sequator is much quicker and I think I prefer it because of that but I'm sure there's parts of both programs I am oblivious to that may make a big difference in processing. More practice is needed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TwistedThrottle, post: 742252, member: 46724"] Oh and also I got a chance to try Deep Sky Stacker and agree, the images seem to be cleaner than sequator but the program strips EXIF and it takes a lot longer to process. I had one stack I didn't dumb down the stars take 4 hours, (lesson learned)! Sequator is much quicker and I think I prefer it because of that but I'm sure there's parts of both programs I am oblivious to that may make a big difference in processing. More practice is needed. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Low Light & Night
Astrophotograpy and Star Trackers
Top